CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

cicd-automation-workflow-automate

You are a workflow automation expert specializing in creating efficient CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, and automated development processes. Design and implement automation that reduces manual work, improves consistency, and accelerates delivery while maintaining quality and security.

48

Quality

51%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/cicd-automation-workflow-automate/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is cicd-automation-workflow-automate in rmyndharis/antigravity-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

42%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is reasonably structured and concise but suffers from low actionability — high-level directives with concrete detail deferred to a missing file — and a dangling reference that undermines progressive disclosure. Workflow clarity is capped by the absence of validation checkpoints for destructive deployment operations.

Suggestions

Either add the referenced 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' (and correct the path from 'resources/' to the bundle convention if needed) or inline concrete examples such as a sample GitHub Actions workflow YAML and specific security-scan commands.

Add explicit validation checkpoints to the workflow, e.g., 'validate workflow YAML before committing', 'run the pipeline on a branch and confirm green before merging', and a rollback-verification step after risky deploys.

Remove the duplicated opening paragraph and tighten the generic Context section to improve token efficiency.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean and avoids explaining CI/CD basics, but the opening paragraph duplicates the frontmatter description verbatim and the Context section restates generic aims, adding tokens that could be trimmed.

3 / 5

Actionability

Instructions are high-level directives ('Define pipeline stages with caching, artifacts, and quality gates', 'Add security scans') with no concrete commands, example workflow YAML, or tooling specifics, and the detailed guidance is deferred to a referenced file that does not exist on disk.

2 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A reasonable five-step sequence is present, but since CI/CD involves destructive deployment and batch operations the rubric caps workflow clarity at 3 when validation checkpoints are missing; the workflow lacks explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loops, and the Safety section only acknowledges risk rather than embedding checkpoints.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-sectioned and points to a single one-level-deep reference, but the referenced 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' does not exist on disk (no resources/, references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), leaving a dangling reference that breaks navigation.

3 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description names a specific, distinct domain with good natural trigger terms but lacks an explicit 'Use when' clause and offers limited concrete actions, capping completeness and specificity. It is solid but not exemplary.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause (e.g., 'Use when automating CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, or build/test/deploy flows') to raise completeness above 3.

Replace benefit statements ('reduces manual work, improves consistency, accelerates delivery') with concrete actions like 'define pipeline stages, configure caching/artifacts, add quality gates' to improve specificity.

Include common synonyms and file extensions (e.g., 'release pipeline', '.github/workflows', 'workflow YAML') to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain concretely ('CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows') but the only concrete action verbs are 'Design and implement'; the remaining clauses ('reduces manual work, improves consistency, accelerates delivery') describe outcomes rather than actions, so coverage is not comprehensive.

3 / 5

Completeness

Provides a clear 'what' but contains no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3; it cannot reach 4 without an explicit 'when'.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms users actually say ('CI/CD pipelines', 'GitHub Actions workflows', 'automation', 'deployment'), giving good keyword coverage; it stops short of comprehensive coverage by omitting synonyms and file extensions like 'release/build pipeline', '.github/workflows', or 'YAML'.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The CI/CD and GitHub Actions automation niche is mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against general coding/dev skills; it is not a fully clear niche (5) because the automation framing is still fairly broad.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.