Content
26%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-sectioned and lean but substantively empty: it provides no executable guidance, no workflow, and no detail beyond repeating the skill's name. Only progressive disclosure scores well thanks to its organized structure.
Suggestions
Replace the abstract Instructions with concrete, actionable steps or executable examples (e.g. a sample analysis script or command).
Define an explicit multi-step workflow with validation checkpoints for any batch or destructive research operations.
Remove the verbatim repetition of 'scientific research and analysis skills' across sections and use each section to add distinct value.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and lean, but the phrase 'scientific research and analysis skills' is repeated nearly verbatim across Overview, When, and Instructions sections, adding no new information; it is mostly efficient but could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | No concrete code, commands, or specific steps are provided — 'provides guidance and patterns' only describes rather than instructs, matching the 'Entirely vague or abstract' anchor. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no sequence of steps and no actionable workflow at all; the Instructions section offers a single abstract sentence with no validation or process. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files and uses clear section headers (Overview, When to Use, Instructions) plus a single one-level source link, giving good structure with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 9 / 20 Passed |