CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

clickup-automation

Automate ClickUp project management including tasks, spaces, folders, lists, comments, and team operations via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

54

Quality

61%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/clickup-automation/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

52%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill provides comprehensive coverage of ClickUp automation workflows with good tool sequencing and useful pitfall documentation, but suffers from significant verbosity through repeated information across sections. The lack of any bundle files means all content is crammed into a single long document, and the absence of executable examples (actual tool call syntax with sample values) limits actionability despite thorough parameter documentation.

Suggestions

Consolidate repeated pitfalls (millisecond timestamps, case-sensitive statuses, team_id = workspace ID) into a single 'Known Pitfalls' section and remove duplicates from individual workflow sections.

Move the quick reference table and detailed parameter documentation into separate bundle files (e.g., REFERENCE.md, PARAMETERS.md) and reference them from the main SKILL.md.

Add at least one concrete example showing an actual tool invocation with sample parameter values (e.g., a complete CLICKUP_CREATE_TASK call with realistic inputs) to improve actionability.

Add explicit validation/confirmation steps for destructive operations like CLICKUP_DELETE_TASK and bulk creation workflows to improve workflow safety.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is significantly verbose with substantial repetition. Pitfalls about millisecond timestamps, case-sensitive statuses, and team_id meaning workspace ID are repeated across multiple sections. The 'Known Pitfalls' section largely duplicates pitfalls already listed under each workflow. The quick reference table, while useful, adds bulk when the tool sequences already list the same information. Much of this could be consolidated.

2 / 5

Actionability

The skill provides concrete tool names, specific parameter names with types, and clear tool sequences for each workflow. However, there are no executable code examples or copy-paste ready commands — everything is described at the tool-call level with parameter documentation rather than showing actual invocation syntax with example values. The key parameters and pitfalls sections are quite specific and useful.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Each workflow has a clearly numbered tool sequence with prerequisite/required/optional annotations, which is helpful. The hierarchy navigation and ID resolution patterns are well-documented. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints or error recovery loops — for instance, the delete task workflow has no confirmation step, and bulk task creation mentions duplicate risk but doesn't provide a concrete validation/recovery pattern.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The content is a monolithic ~200+ line document with no references to external files. The detailed parameter documentation, pitfalls repeated in multiple places, and the full quick reference table all contribute to a wall of content that would benefit from being split into separate reference files (e.g., a PARAMETERS.md, PITFALLS.md, or QUICK_REFERENCE.md). No bundle files are provided to offload this content.

2 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description effectively identifies the platform (ClickUp) and lists the key entities it manages, making it distinctive and reasonably specific. However, it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause, which weakens completeness, and the actions are described generically as 'automate' rather than listing concrete operations like creating, updating, or deleting resources.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user mentions ClickUp, asks about project management tasks, or wants to manage spaces, folders, or lists in ClickUp.'

Replace the generic 'automate' with specific actions such as 'create, update, and delete tasks; manage spaces and folders; post comments; assign team members'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several specific entities (tasks, spaces, folders, lists, comments, team operations) and mentions the tool/platform (ClickUp via Rube MCP/Composio). Minor gaps in describing specific actions—it says 'automate' but doesn't enumerate concrete actions like 'create tasks', 'assign members', 'update statuses'.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is reasonably clear (automate ClickUp project management across various entities), but there is no explicit 'when' clause (e.g., 'Use when the user asks about ClickUp tasks or project management'). The absence of a 'Use when...' clause caps this at 3 per the rubric guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural keywords like 'ClickUp', 'tasks', 'spaces', 'folders', 'lists', 'comments', 'team', and 'project management'. Missing some natural user phrases like 'assign', 'due date', 'status', 'workspace', or 'to-do' that users might say.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive due to the specific platform name 'ClickUp' and the tooling reference 'Rube MCP (Composio)'. Very unlikely to conflict with other skills; the niche is clearly defined.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.