Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable and well-structured, but the destructive delete workflow lacks a validation checkpoint and the inline reference material is somewhat redundant across sections.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/confirmation step to the Delete Activities workflow (e.g., verify call_id and confirm with the user before calling CLOSE_DELETE_CALL, since deletion is permanent).
Deduplicate the per-workflow "Pitfalls" and the consolidated "Known Pitfalls" section, or move the consolidated pitfalls into a separate reference file.
Include at least one fully worked example showing the tool-call sequence for a common end-to-end flow (e.g., resolve lead_id then log a call).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with structured tool sequences and parameters and no padding about CRM basics, though the per-workflow "Pitfalls" blocks and the consolidated "Known Pitfalls" / "Quick Reference" sections introduce some redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool slugs (e.g., CLOSE_CREATE_LEAD), named parameters with types, and ID formats give mostly copy-ready guidance, with minor gaps such as no worked end-to-end call example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are present and the Setup step includes a validation checkpoint (confirm ACTIVE), but the destructive "Delete Activities" workflow lacks any validation/confirmation step, capping workflow_clarity at 3 per the rubric. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clear sections with no nested references, but at ~200 lines all material is inlined and the consolidated pitfalls/reference content could plausibly live in a separate reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |