Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured operating policy with a clearly sequenced workflow, explicit validation checkpoints, feedback loops, and concrete defaults and polling windows. Its main gaps are a few spots where guidance says what to do but not how, and minor redundancy that could be trimmed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, terse bullet style throughout with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; only minor trimming possible (the polling section restates the batching rationale twice, and the Issue Gate Dependency section repeats the acceptance-criteria point from Required Inputs). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable specifics are given (defaults of 'dev' and max rounds '2', exact polling windows '3m'/'6m'/'10m', a DoD example, escalation report contents, and a completion checklist), but guidance like 'Verify via real API/Lambda/log evidence' states what to do without any how, and no commands for fetching PR comments are provided. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step numbered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (verify locally, re-run after fixes, runtime verification against DoD, completion gated on all DoD checks), feedback loops for error recovery, explicit stop conditions, and a completion checklist in the Output Contract — matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-file skill (117 lines) with no bundle files and well-organized, clearly headed sections; the content is cohesive operating policy that reasonably stays inline, though the >50-line single-file stretch and sections like the polling policy that could be split keep it just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |