Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable strategy skill that leans on tables, templates, and checklists rather than prose, assuming Claude's competence throughout. The main improvements are removing minor redundancy and considering reference files for the longer detail tables.
Suggestions
Remove the redundant 'Task-Specific Questions' section (its content is already covered by the 'Questions to identify partners' and brainstorming prompts) and fix the stray double horizontal rule near 'Related Skills'.
Consider moving the detailed campaign-type tables and the agreement outline into a reference file (e.g. references/campaign-types.md) to shorten SKILL.md into a tighter overview.
Add an explicit checkpoint between campaign planning and execution (e.g. 'Confirm lead-sharing arrangement and responsibilities are documented before creating assets') to strengthen workflow validation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense tables and checklists assume Claude's competence with no conceptual preamble, but carries minor redundancy (the 'Task-Specific Questions' echo earlier questions, the intro restates the description, and a stray double '---' rule) that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste cold-outreach template, a 1–5 partner scoring table, named data sources (Crossbeam/Reveal, G2/Capterra), a co-marketing agreement outline, and phase-based checklists — concrete and specific enough to execute without code. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-phase sequence (Partner Identification → Campaign Planning → Execution → Post-Campaign) with a post-campaign debrief feedback loop, but lacks explicit validation checkpoints between phases; the non-destructive nature means no validation cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the single SKILL.md is well-organized with clear section headers and no nested references, though some detailed material (campaign-type tables, agreement outline) could plausibly live in reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |