competitive-landscape

Comprehensive frameworks for analyzing competition, identifying differentiation opportunities, and developing winning market positioning strategies.

Quality

27%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/competitive-landscape/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is competitive-landscape in rmyndharis/antigravity-skills

Quality

Content

22%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill is essentially a placeholder with no substantive content about competitive landscape analysis. It provides generic meta-instructions that could apply to any skill rather than specific frameworks, methods, or examples for analyzing competition. The entire value is deferred to an external resource file, making the SKILL.md itself nearly useless.

Suggestions

Add concrete competitive analysis frameworks (e.g., Porter's Five Forces, SWOT, competitive positioning matrix) with specific steps and examples

Include at least one executable workflow showing how to conduct a competitive analysis from start to finish with clear inputs and outputs

Replace generic instructions ('Apply relevant best practices') with specific, actionable guidance for competitive analysis tasks

Add example outputs showing what a completed competitive analysis deliverable looks like

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The content is brief but includes generic boilerplate ('Use this skill when', 'Do not use this skill when') that adds little value. The instructions are vague placeholders rather than substantive guidance.	2 / 3
Actionability	The instructions are entirely abstract ('Clarify goals', 'Apply relevant best practices', 'Provide actionable steps') with no concrete frameworks, specific analysis methods, competitive analysis templates, or executable guidance for actually performing competitive landscape analysis.	1 / 3
Workflow Clarity	There is no clear workflow or sequence of steps for conducting competitive analysis. The four bullet points are generic meta-instructions, not a process for analyzing competition or developing positioning strategies.	1 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The skill references an external resource file appropriately, but the main content is so thin that it's unclear what value the overview provides. The reference to implementation-playbook.md is good structure, but the skill body itself lacks substantive overview content.	2 / 3
	Total	6 / 12 Passed

Description

32%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a clear business domain but relies heavily on abstract buzzwords ('comprehensive frameworks', 'winning strategies') rather than concrete actions. The critical weakness is the complete absence of explicit trigger guidance, making it difficult for Claude to know when to select this skill over other business-related skills.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with explicit triggers like 'Use when the user asks about competitors, competitive analysis, market positioning, or differentiation strategy'

Replace vague terms like 'comprehensive frameworks' with specific deliverables such as 'Creates competitor profiles, SWOT analyses, positioning maps, and differentiation matrices'

Include natural user terms like 'competitors', 'competitive landscape', 'market share', 'competitive advantage' to improve trigger matching

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (competitive analysis, market positioning) and mentions some actions ('analyzing competition', 'identifying differentiation opportunities', 'developing strategies'), but uses abstract language like 'comprehensive frameworks' and 'winning' which are vague buzzwords rather than concrete actions.	2 / 3
Completeness	Describes what the skill does (frameworks for analysis and strategy) but completely lacks any 'Use when...' clause or explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill.	1 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Contains some relevant keywords like 'competition', 'differentiation', 'market positioning', and 'strategies', but misses common user variations like 'competitors', 'competitive landscape', 'market analysis', 'SWOT', or 'competitive advantage'.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Somewhat specific to competitive/market analysis domain, but could overlap with general business strategy skills, market research skills, or strategic planning skills due to broad terms like 'strategies' and 'frameworks'.	2 / 3
	Total	7 / 12 Passed

Validation

90%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	10 / 11 Passed

Repository: administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Path: plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/competitive-landscape/SKILL.md
Commit: 7520423

Reviewed: ~16 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.