concise-planning

Use when a user asks for a plan for a coding task, to generate a clear, actionable, and atomic checklist.

1.46x

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

97%

1.46x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/concise-planning/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is concise-planning in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is concise, well-structured, and actionable with a clear workflow and an embedded validation step, appropriate for a simple single-purpose planning skill. Its main gap is the generic 'When to Use' boilerplate and the absence of a revision feedback loop.

Suggestions

Replace the generic 'When to Use' line with concrete trigger conditions matching the description's when-clause.

Add a short feedback loop such as 'if an assumption is invalidated, regenerate the affected action items before proceeding'.

Make the open-questions handling explicit (e.g., cap at 3 and state that non-blocking questions default to assumptions) rather than leaving it to the template placeholder.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean with well-organized sections and no concept explanations Claude already knows; only the generic 'When to Use' line ('applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview') reads as boilerplate filler, keeping it just below a 5.	4 / 5
Actionability	It provides a copy-paste-ready markdown plan template, an ordered workflow, and concrete checklist rules (Verb-first with 'Add...', 'Refactor...', 'Verify...' examples); minor gaps remain around how to surface assumptions and handle the open-questions limit, so not a 5.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The Scan Context → Minimal Interaction → Generate Plan sequence is clear and the template embeds a Validation/Testing step as a checkpoint; it is not a 5 because there is no explicit feedback loop for revising the plan when assumptions prove wrong.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references, and is organized into clearly headed sections (Goal, Workflow, Plan Template, Checklist Guidelines), meeting the simple-skill exception that awards a 5 for well-organized content.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly answers what the skill does and when to use it with a concrete trigger clause, but its action list is single rather than comprehensive and trigger synonyms are limited. It is a solid, concise description with room to add more concrete actions and natural phrasings.

Suggestions

Add 1-2 more concrete actions (e.g., 'break work into atomic steps, flag scope and open questions') to raise specificity toward comprehensive coverage.

Include common synonyms in the trigger clause such as 'to-do list', 'task breakdown', or 'step-by-step plan' to improve trigger-term coverage.

Tighten the when-clause with explicit user phrasings (e.g., 'Use when the user asks for a plan, a task breakdown, or an actionable checklist for a coding task').

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain (planning a coding task) and one concrete action ('to generate a clear, actionable, and atomic checklist'), but does not list multiple specific actions — matching the anchor that names the domain with 1-2 concrete actions.	3 / 5
Completeness	It explicitly states both the 'what' ('generate a clear, actionable, and atomic checklist') and the 'when' ('Use when a user asks for a plan for a coding task'), though the trigger could list more specific phrasings to reach a 5.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	'plan for a coding task' and 'checklist' are natural user phrases, but common synonyms like 'to-do list', 'task breakdown', or 'steps' are missing, placing it at the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The planning/checklist-generation niche is mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against closely related planning skills; it does not fall to a 5 because triggers are not exhaustive enough to eliminate all conflict risk.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Path: plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/concise-planning/SKILL.md
Commit: 57c135b

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.