Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable codification of specialized trade-compliance expertise with clear sequenced workflows and properly signaled one-level-deep references. Its main weakness is conciseness: a long role preamble, conceptual intros, and narrative communication examples add length that could be trimmed without losing actionable value.
Suggestions
Trim the Role and Context preamble and the conceptual Incoterms introduction to the specialized compliance implications Claude would not already know.
Compress the narrative tone-calibration dialogues into compact template cues rather than full quoted example exchanges.
Consider moving the Regional Specialties and detailed penalty-framework breakdowns into a reference file so the body reads as a leaner overview pointing to depth.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Most of the dense material (GRI rules, 19 USC § 1592 tiers, ISF 10+2 elements) is genuinely specialized and earns its tokens, but the role preamble, conceptual Incoterms intro, and the narrative tone-calibration dialogues are explanation that could be tightened, matching the 3-anchor "mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation". | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides highly concrete, specific guidance — numbered decision frameworks, RVC formulas, citation-specific penalty multipliers, an 85% screening threshold, and timeline-bound escalation triggers — with only minor gaps where full detail is deferred to the reference files, fitting the 4-anchor "mostly executable guidance with minor gaps". | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multiple workflows (classification, FTA qualification, valuation method hierarchy, screening hit assessment) are clearly numbered and sequenced with branching decision points and "document the rationale" steps, but they lack explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops, sitting at the 4-anchor rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Three real one-level-deep references (decision-frameworks.md, edge-cases.md, communication-templates.md) are well-signaled inline and consolidated in an Additional Resources section, but the 28KB body inlines substantial core-knowledge and regional detail beyond a lean overview, matching the 4-anchor "good structure, references mostly clear, minor organization gaps". | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |