CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

daily

Documentation and capabilities reference for Daily

42

Quality

43%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/daily/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is daily in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a comprehensive, well-structured platform reference with several executable code examples, but it is verbose (re-explaining concepts and duplicating itself in a 'Context' section), its workflows lack validation checkpoints, and it is a monolith with no progressive disclosure into bundle files.

Suggestions

Trim the 'Context' section and conceptual prose that re-states the capabilities; keep only what Claude cannot infer about Pipecat.

Add explicit validation/verification steps (e.g. validate the assembled pipeline, smoke-test the Twilio dial-in, confirm a deploy is healthy) to the deploy and telephony workflows.

Move the large integration/provider lists and per-service details into one-level-deep reference files (e.g. references/providers.md, references/transports.md) and link them from the overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with concrete code blocks, but the prose repeatedly explains framework concepts Claude already knows ('All data moves through pipelines as frames', 'Pipecat achieves 500-800ms...') and the 'Context' section largely restates the capabilities above, so it could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

The Pipeline, FunctionSchema, and CustomProcessor code blocks are executable and copy-paste ready, while the numbered workflows are higher-level hints ('Initialize STT service (Deepgram, OpenAI, Google Cloud)') — concrete code with minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Workflows are clearly sequenced as numbered steps, but none include validation or feedback loops; the deploy-to-cloud and Twilio-dialin workflows are risky operations with no verify/retry checkpoints, so workflow clarity is capped at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-sectioned (Capabilities, Skills, Workflows, Integration, Context) but it is a single monolithic file with all detail inlined and no split-out reference files — only a trailing link to docs.pipecat.ai — so content that belongs in separate files is inline.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

28%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is a terse label rather than a trigger-oriented capability statement: it identifies the domain but omits concrete actions, natural trigger terms, and any 'Use when' guidance. It would rarely be surfaced by a user's natural phrasing.

Suggestions

Replace the generic 'documentation and capabilities reference' with concrete actions, e.g. 'Build production voice and multimodal AI pipelines with Pipecat over Daily WebRTC'.

Add a 'Use when...' clause naming natural trigger phrases users say: 'voice assistant', 'real-time audio/video', 'Pipecat', 'Daily WebRTC', 'turn-taking/interruption handling'.

State the niche explicitly (Pipecat real-time voice/multimodal pipelines on Daily transport) to reduce overlap with generic documentation skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain ('Daily') but the action ('Documentation and capabilities reference') is generic with no concrete capabilities described, matching the 'names the domain but actions are minimal or generic' anchor.

2 / 5

Completeness

It offers a vague 'what' ('documentation and capabilities reference for Daily') and no 'when'/'Use when' clause, so the missing trigger guidance caps completeness at 2 per the rubric.

2 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Only 'Daily' appears as a keyword; natural trigger phrases a user would say (e.g. 'voice assistant', 'Pipecat', 'real-time audio', 'WebRTC') are entirely absent, leaving one or two generic keywords with the natural phrases missing.

2 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Daily' names a specific product niche giving some distinctiveness, but the generic 'documentation and capabilities reference' phrasing could still overlap with similar platform-doc skills.

3 / 5

Total

9

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.