CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

data-structure-protocol

Give agents persistent structural memory of a codebase — navigate dependencies, track public APIs, and understand why connections exist without re-reading the whole repo.

58

Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/data-structure-protocol/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is data-structure-protocol in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with concrete CLI examples and clear update rules, but workflow clarity is capped by the absence of explicit validation feedback loops around destructive and batch DSP operations.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation checkpoint after destructive/batch DSP changes — e.g. run `get-stats`/`detect-cycles`/`get-orphans` to verify consistency, and re-run on failure before proceeding.

Move the full storage-format tree and command table into a local reference file to keep SKILL.md a lean overview.

Trim conceptual framing (graph basics, the "NOT an AST dump" disclaimers) that Claude can infer.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient and focused on DSP-specific concepts and CLI commands, with only minor over-explanation (e.g. the "NOT documentation / NOT an AST dump" framing and basic graph model recap) that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable guidance: concrete `python dsp-cli.py` commands, a full command table, and three copy-paste-ready bash examples with expected outputs covering setup, navigation, and impact analysis.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Bootstrap and update rules are well sequenced, but destructive/batch operations (remove-entity with cascade cleanup, whole-repo bootstrap) lack explicit validation-retry checkpoints, which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the guideline.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections with a References block pointing one level deep to external docs; with no bundle files the inline spec is justified, though the full storage-format and command tables could plausibly live in a separate reference file.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description communicates a clear, fairly distinct purpose with concrete actions, but lacks an explicit "when to use" trigger clause and natural user-facing trigger terms, which cap completeness and trigger quality.

Suggestions

Add an explicit "Use when..." clause naming natural triggers like `.dsp` directories, structure mapping, or impact analysis before a refactor.

Include user-natural terms and synonyms (e.g. "dependency graph", ".dsp", "bootstrap") in the description.

Tighten the goal framing into concrete capabilities so specificity reaches comprehensive coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — "navigate dependencies", "track public APIs", "understand why connections exist" — but framing as "persistent structural memory" is more goal than action, leaving minor gaps.

4 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clear (persistent structural memory enabling dependency navigation), but there is no explicit "Use when..." clause; per the guideline a missing trigger clause caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords like "codebase", "dependencies", and "public APIs" appear, but natural user trigger phrases (e.g. "structure mapping", ".dsp", "DSP") and synonyms are missing from the description.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Persistent structural memory" and dependency-graph framing carve a clear niche, though minor overlap risk exists with related context/architecture skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.