CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

deep-research

Run autonomous research tasks that plan, search, read, and synthesize information into comprehensive reports.

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/deep-research/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is deep-research in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with copy-paste commands and a clear sequenced workflow, organized into clean sections without nested references. Its main weaknesses are mild redundancy between the use-case sections and implicit rather than explicit validation checkpoints in the workflow.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean executable commands, but 'When to Use' and 'Best Use Cases' are near-duplicate lists and the 'Workflow' section restates Usage, placing it at 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed'.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides copy-paste bash commands with explicit flags covering query, format, stream, no-wait, status, wait, continue, and list operations, matching 'fully executable; copy-paste ready; covers common cases'.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear five-step Workflow with monitoring via stream/status is present; the operation is non-destructive so the cap-3 rule does not apply, but validation checkpoints are only implicit rather than explicit.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained SKILL.md is well-sectioned with no nested references and no bundle files; at ~107 lines it exceeds the simple-skill 50-line threshold, so it sits at 'good structure; minor organization gaps' rather than a clean 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys concrete capabilities with a clear 'what' but lacks an explicit 'when to use' trigger clause and relies on a single keyword without synonyms, which limits trigger quality and completeness. It is mostly distinct from other skills but not maximally so.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural trigger phrases such as market analysis, literature review, or due diligence.

Include keyword synonyms and variations (e.g. 'investigate', 'literature review', 'competitive landscaping') to broaden natural trigger coverage.

Tighten the distinctiveness by referencing the deliverable format, e.g. 'comprehensive cited research reports', to reduce overlap with generic search skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The phrase 'plan, search, read, and synthesize information into comprehensive reports' lists several concrete actions, fitting the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor rather than the fully comprehensive anchor 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does but omits any 'Use when...' trigger guidance; per the rubric a missing when-clause caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It surfaces the natural term 'research' but offers no synonyms or variations users might say (e.g. investigate, literature review), matching the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Autonomous research tasks' with 'comprehensive reports' carves a recognizable niche, though it could overlap with generic web-search or research skills, fitting the 'mostly distinct; minor overlap' anchor.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 8 missing

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.