CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

deployment-procedures

Production deployment principles and decision-making. Safe deployment workflows, rollback strategies, and verification. Teaches thinking, not scripts.

55

Quality

63%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/deployment-procedures/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is deployment-procedures in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, mostly lean principles document with a clear phased workflow and rollback feedback loop. It is held back by overlapping checklist sections and actionability that stays deliberately principle-level rather than concrete.

Suggestions

Consolidate the redundant checklists (Pre-Deployment, Decision Checklist, Best Practices, Anti-Patterns) into one authoritative checklist to reduce token overlap.

Add concrete, executable examples for at least one platform's deploy and rollback path to lift actionability beyond principle-level hints.

Move platform-specific deployment and rollback method tables into reference files and signal them from the overview to improve progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is table- and checklist-driven and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but several sections overlap (Pre-Deployment Checklist, Decision Checklist, Best Practices, Anti-Patterns) and the 'How to Use This Skill' block restates the frontmatter, so it could be tightened past the 3-anchor.

3 / 5

Actionability

Some concrete guidance exists (platform-specific rollback methods like 'kubectl rollout undo', symptom-to-action tables) but most direction is principle-level with intentionally vague entries like 'SSH + manual steps', matching the 3-anchor's incomplete-but-present concrete guidance rather than the executable 4-anchor.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 5-phase process (PREPARE, BACKUP, DEPLOY, VERIFY, CONFIRM/ROLLBACK) is clearly sequenced with an explicit verify checkpoint and rollback feedback loop plus checklists, satisfying the 4-anchor's clear sequence with most checkpoints present; not 5 because validation is principle-level rather than explicit commands.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the content is a single well-organized file split into 10 clearly headed numbered sections with no nested references, fitting the 4-anchor's good structure; not 5 because at ~240 lines platform-specific material that could live in reference files is inlined.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, third-person, and reasonably distinct, clearly stating what the skill covers. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which caps completeness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when planning or executing a production deployment, rollback, or post-deploy verification.'

Include natural synonyms users say such as 'release', 'ship', or 'CI/CD' to broaden trigger coverage.

Consider naming zero-downtime or canary strategies in the description to lift specificity toward 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain plus several concrete actions — "Safe deployment workflows, rollback strategies, and verification" — comparable to the anchor listing several specific actions with minor coverage gaps, not the 3-anchor's mere 1-2 actions.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (deployment principles, workflows, rollback, verification) but there is no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, so per the judging guideline completeness is capped at 3 with only a weakly implied 'when'.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user-facing terms like "production deployment", "rollback", "verification" are present, but common synonyms such as "release", "ship", or "CI/CD" are missing, matching the 4-anchor's good-but-incomplete keyword coverage.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Production deployment" with rollback/verification framing carves a mostly distinct niche with only minor overlap risk against generic CI/CD or DevOps skills, fitting the 4-anchor rather than the broader 3-anchor.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.