Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, highly actionable instruction-only workflow with strong validation gates and feedback loops. Its main weakness is mild verbosity from repeated announcement/restatement phrasing; progressive disclosure is sound for a single-file skill though it could optionally factor out detailed procedures.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient procedural detail for a genuinely complex branching workflow, but it carries noticeable repetition (repeated 'Announce intention to...' phrasing and restated 'Inform them that the initial structure...will be created' steps) that could be tightened, fitting anchor 3; not 2 because the detail is largely purposeful rather than padded concept explanation. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete procedural guidance with specific counts (5-10 questions, 5-20 brainstorm options), explicit tool calls (create_file, str_replace), and worked curation examples ('Keep 1,4,7,9', 'Remove 3 (duplicates 1)'); code absence is not penalized for an instruction skill, fitting anchor 4 with minor gaps from templated [SECTION NAME] placeholders. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three stages are clearly sequenced with numbered steps, explicit per-stage exit conditions, transition prompts, a quality-check checkpoint after three idle iterations, and a reader-testing validation gate with a feedback loop back to refinement, matching anchor 5's explicit validation and feedback-loop criteria. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the single SKILL.md is organized into clear stage/step headers with no nested references and coherent as one workflow, fitting anchor 4; not 5 only because at ~380 lines some detailed per-section procedures could optionally be split into references, though it is not strictly necessary. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |