CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

docs-architect

Creates comprehensive technical documentation from existing codebases. Analyzes architecture, design patterns, and implementation details to produce long-form technical manuals and ebooks.

49

Quality

54%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/docs-architect/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is docs-architect in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content provides a serviceable high-level process outline and a concrete list of sections to produce, but it leans on generic/placeholder prose and lacks executable examples, templates, or validation steps. Its single external reference is broken.

Suggestions

Replace the generic 'Use this skill when' / 'Instructions' boilerplate with concrete, domain-specific triggers and steps; remove abstract competencies and best-practice bullets that restate common knowledge.

Add an executable example or template (e.g., a sample chapter scaffold, a command for generating a diagram, or a concrete output skeleton) to lift actionability.

Fix the broken reference: either create references/implementation-playbook.md and link it as references/implementation-playbook.md, or remove the pointer; add explicit validation/review checkpoints to the writing workflow.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is organized with clear sections but is padded with generic competencies ('Technical Writing: Clear, precise explanations') and best-practice bullets that largely restate what Claude already knows.

3 / 5

Actionability

There is some concrete guidance (the 10-item 'Key Sections to Include' list and the 'Output Format' spec), but most direction is high-level ('Analyze codebase structure and dependencies') with no examples, templates, or commands.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Documentation Process lays out a sequenced Discovery/Structuring/Writing phases, but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops; since this is not a destructive or batch operation, no hard cap applies.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The single file is reasonably sectioned, but the one external reference points to 'resources/implementation-playbook.md', a path that does not exist (no references/ directory is present), so navigation is unclear and content stays inline.

3 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states what the skill does and names several concrete actions, giving it a distinct niche. It is held back by the absence of any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance and limited natural trigger-term coverage.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with concrete trigger phrases (e.g., 'Use when the user asks to document a codebase, write a technical manual or ebook, or produce architecture documentation').

Include natural synonyms and variations users actually say, such as 'document my code', 'write docs', 'onboarding guide', or 'architecture review'.

Tighten 'comprehensive technical documentation' into more specific deliverables to lift specificity from several to comprehensive coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('Analyzes architecture, design patterns, and implementation details', 'produce long-form technical manuals and ebooks') rather than vague language, though 'comprehensive technical documentation' is somewhat generic.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (creates long-form technical documentation from codebases), but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, capping completeness at 3 per the rubric guideline.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords appear (documentation, architecture, manuals, ebooks) but common natural variations, synonyms, and trigger phrasing a user would actually say are missing.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche of long-form manuals and ebooks generated from existing codebases is fairly distinct, with only minor overlap risk against general documentation skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.