Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured routing skill with concrete skill pointers, a gating viability check, and a properly disclosed one-level reference file. Main improvement would be adding explicit validation/feedback checkpoints after routing decisions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean ~65-line body that assumes Claude's DDD competence with no padded concept explanations; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete routing map of named skills, explicit viability criteria (two-of-four), and a specific output checklist provide mostly executable guidance, though it routes rather than supplies direct implementation steps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence with a viability-check gate and explicit pass criteria, plus defined output requirements; minor validation gaps keep it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview body points to a single, clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/ddd-deliverables.md, verified to exist) with well-organized sections and easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |