CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

dropbox-automation

Automate Dropbox file management, sharing, search, uploads, downloads, and folder operations via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

57

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/dropbox-automation/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is dropbox-automation in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body provides thorough, well-organized, actionable Dropbox MCP guidance, but is held back by content redundancy, missing pre-destruction validation on delete/batch workflows, and a single-file monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation step before destructive/batch operations, e.g. 'Call DROPBOX_GET_METADATA to confirm the path before DROPBOX_DELETE_FILE_OR_FOLDER'.

Move the detailed parameter reference and Quick Reference table into a separate reference file (e.g. references/tool-reference.md) and link from the body to reduce inline redundancy.

De-duplicate pitfalls: keep them in each workflow or in 'Known Pitfalls', not both, to tighten token use.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly useful Dropbox-specific detail, but the 'Known Pitfalls' section and 'Quick Reference' table restate per-workflow pitfalls and tool mappings, adding redundancy that could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete tool slugs, specific parameters with example values (e.g. '/Documents/report.pdf', 'image'/'document'), and numbered tool sequences give highly actionable guidance, with minor gaps in full example call payloads.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Workflows are clearly sequenced with some checkpoints (confirm ACTIVE connection, validate path before sharing), but the destructive delete/batch workflows lack explicit pre-destruction validation, capping workflow clarity at 3 per the batch/destructive rule.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-structured with clear section headers, but everything is inline in a single ~226-line file with no bundle files; detailed parameter reference and the large quick-reference table could live in separate reference files.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, distinct, and names concrete Dropbox actions, but lacks an explicit 'when to use' trigger clause, which caps completeness. Adding a 'Use when ...' sentence would raise the score.

Suggestions

Append an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to manage, share, search, upload, or download files in Dropbox.'

Add a few natural synonyms or file extensions (e.g. 'Dropbox files, shared links, .pdf uploads') to broaden trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'file management, sharing, search, uploads, downloads, and folder operations' — giving comprehensive coverage of Dropbox capabilities.

5 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clearly stated, but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance; 'Always search tools first for current schemas' is an operational instruction, not a usage trigger, capping completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural keywords like 'Dropbox', 'sharing', 'search', 'uploads', 'downloads' are present, but synonyms and file extensions are missing, so it falls just short of comprehensive coverage.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped explicitly to 'Dropbox ... via Rube MCP (Composio)', giving it a clear niche with minimal overlap risk against other skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.