CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

expo-api-routes

Guidelines for creating API routes in Expo Router with EAS Hosting

60

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/expo-api-routes/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is expo-api-routes in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with comprehensive executable examples and clear organization, supported by genuinely non-obvious runtime/deployment specifics. Its main weakness is mild verbosity and the absence of explicit validation checkpoints in the deploy workflow.

Suggestions

Tighten or consolidate the repetitive HTTP-method examples to reduce token overhead without losing coverage.

Add an explicit post-deploy verification step (e.g. curl the live endpoint) to the deployment workflow.

Consider moving the runtime-constraints and common-patterns sections into reference files to improve progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is largely efficient with clean code blocks and useful non-obvious specifics (Cloudflare Workers runtime, 30s timeout, no fs), but contains some trimmable prose and repeated patterns across HTTP-method examples. It is above 3 because most content earns its place, but not a 5 due to minor padding.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides abundant copy-paste-ready, executable code and concrete commands (npx expo serve, eas deploy, eas env:create) covering the common cases from CRUD through CORS, env vars, databases, and auth. Fully actionable with no significant gaps.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The deployment section gives a clear sequence (install eas-cli, login, deploy, set env, custom domain) and topics are well organized, with only minor validation gaps (no explicit 'verify the deployed endpoint' checkpoint). Not a 5 because explicit validation/feedback loops are absent, though the operations are non-destructive so no cap at 3 applies.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained file with clear, logical section headers and no nested or broken references; no bundle files are provided so all content is appropriately inline. Not a 5 because some advanced material (runtime constraints, common patterns) could be split into reference files, but structure is good with only minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific to a clear niche and uses relevant natural keywords, but it omits any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance, which limits completeness. Adding a Use-when clause with synonyms would lift the weaker dimensions.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when building backend endpoints, server-side secrets, or webhooks for an Expo Router app deployed to EAS Hosting.'

Include common synonyms users might say (backend, server endpoints, serverless functions) to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Expand the action list beyond 'creating' (e.g. 'create, secure, and deploy API routes') to improve specificity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain concretely ('API routes in Expo Router with EAS Hosting') and one concrete action ('creating'), but offers only a single action rather than comprehensive coverage. It sits above score 2's generic 'names the domain' but lacks the multiple specific actions needed for a 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill covers ('Guidelines for creating API routes...') but provides no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3. It is not a 4 because the 'when' is entirely absent rather than merely weak.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms an Expo developer would say ('API routes', 'Expo Router', 'EAS Hosting') with good coverage, but omits common synonyms like 'backend', 'server endpoints', or 'endpoints'. Not a 5 because those variations are missing, but clearly above the sparse keyword level of 3.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Expo Router + EAS Hosting niche is specific and unlikely to trigger the wrong skill, with only minor overlap risk against general backend/API skills. Not a 5 because there are no explicit distinct trigger phrases to fully separate it from adjacent backend skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.