Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-organized, command-heavy guide that is largely copy-paste executable and covers the full dev-client lifecycle from deciding whether a dev client is needed through building, installing, and troubleshooting. Its main weaknesses are mild redundancy (the platform-flags section and restated --submit behavior) and small gaps like 'eas build:view' lacking its required build ID argument.
Suggestions
Remove the 'Building for Specific Platform' section or fold it into the local/TestFlight sections, since '-p ios/android' is already demonstrated there.
Show 'eas build:view --id <build-id>' (or note how to get the ID from build:list) so the command runs as written.
Resolve placeholder paths like './path/to/App.app' and 'build.ipa' with the actual output locations of an EAS local build.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is command-focused with essentially no concept padding, but it contains unnecessary material that could be tightened: 'Building for Specific Platform' duplicates the '-p ios/android --profile development' flags already shown in the TestFlight and Local Build sections, and 'This will: 1... 2... 3...' restates what '--submit' does. This matches anchor 3 (mostly efficient but some unnecessary explanation) better than anchor 4's 'minor instances'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Nearly all guidance is concrete and executable: 'eas build -p ios --profile development --submit', 'tar -xzf build-*.tar.gz', 'xcrun simctl install booted ./path/to/App.app', 'adb install build.apk'. Minor gaps keep it at anchor 4 rather than 5: 'eas build:view' is shown without the build ID it requires, and placeholders like './path/to/App.app' and 'build.ipa' are not resolved. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The TestFlight flow has a clear numbered sequence (build -> submit -> email -> download -> launch -> connect to Metro), and the Troubleshooting section provides error-recovery guidance for signing errors, cache issues, and CLI versions. Anchor 4 fits: clear sequence with most checkpoints present (build status commands exist), but minor validation gaps such as no explicit check that the build succeeded before submitting or installing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill has no bundle files, and the single-file body is organized into well-labeled sections (When Needed, EAS Configuration, TestFlight, Local, Installing, Status, Using, Troubleshooting) with everything appropriately inline for a single-purpose CLI skill. Anchor 4 fits rather than 5: at ~155 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill case, and one or two sections (e.g., install/troubleshooting detail) could be split into reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |