CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

expo-ui-jetpack-compose

expo-ui-jetpack-compose

46

Quality

48%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/expo-ui-jetpack-compose/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-crafted, concise skill that efficiently communicates how to use @expo/ui/jetpack-compose. It assumes Claude's existing knowledge of Jetpack Compose and Material Design 3, provides a concrete executable example, and points to external docs for API details. The main weakness is relying on external URL fetching for component APIs rather than providing key API signatures inline, which adds latency and a dependency on network access.

Suggestions

Consider inlining the most commonly used component props/APIs (e.g., LazyColumn, Button, Text) to reduce reliance on fetching external docs at runtime.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Every line serves a purpose. No unnecessary explanations of what Jetpack Compose is or how libraries work. The skill assumes Claude's competence and provides only what's needed: installation, key rules, a concrete example, and component highlights.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides a concrete, executable JSX example with imports, a clear installation command, and specific URL patterns for fetching docs. Minor gap: it tells Claude to fetch docs for component APIs rather than providing the key APIs inline, which adds a step of indirection. The Icon and LazyColumn guidance is concrete but brief.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

For a relatively simple skill, the workflow is clear: install, rebuild, wrap in Host, import components/modifiers, and consult docs for specifics. The installation step includes the rebuild requirement. Minor gap: no explicit validation or error-handling guidance (e.g., what happens if Host is missing or modifiers are misapplied), though this isn't a destructive/batch operation so the cap doesn't apply.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill appropriately keeps the overview concise and points to external docs via clear URL patterns for component and modifier details. However, there are no bundle files to offload detailed content to, and the doc URLs are external rather than local references. The structure is clean with clear sections (Installation, Instructions, Key Components).

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

14%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is not a description — it is a skill name or identifier presented as a hyphenated slug. It provides zero information about what the skill does, when it should be used, or what actions it performs. It would be nearly impossible for Claude to reliably select this skill from a list based on this description alone.

Suggestions

Rewrite the description as a full sentence describing concrete actions, e.g., 'Generates Expo UI components using Jetpack Compose for Android, including layouts, theming, and navigation.'

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with trigger terms, e.g., 'Use when the user asks about building Android UI with Expo and Jetpack Compose, or mentions Compose components, Material Design, or Android native UI.'

Include natural keywords and synonyms users might say, such as 'Android UI', 'Compose', 'Expo modules', 'native Android components', and 'Material Design'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description 'expo-ui-jetpack-compose' contains no concrete actions whatsoever. It is merely a compound noun/label with no verbs or descriptions of what the skill does.

1 / 5

Completeness

There is no 'what does this do' explanation and no 'when should Claude use it' guidance. It answers neither question — it's just a name/label.

1 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It contains some recognizable technology keywords ('expo', 'jetpack compose') that a user might mention, but they are presented as a hyphenated slug rather than natural language, and there are no synonyms, variations, or contextual phrases.

2 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of 'expo-ui' and 'jetpack-compose' is somewhat niche and unlikely to conflict with many other skills, but the lack of any descriptive content means it could still be confused with other Expo or Jetpack Compose related skills.

3 / 5

Total

7

/

20

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.