Content
75%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted accessibility skill that efficiently organizes WCAG-related guidance into prioritized, scannable categories with concrete HTML fix examples. Its strengths are clear prioritization, actionable rules, and good before/after code snippets. Minor improvements could include more code examples for complex patterns (focus trapping, aria-live) and an explicit post-fix validation step.
Suggestions
Add a brief validation/verification step after applying fixes, such as recommending an automated accessibility check (e.g., axe-core) or manual keyboard walkthrough to confirm the fix works.
Add one more concrete code example for a complex pattern like focus trapping in a modal dialog, since that's listed as critical but has no corresponding fix example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is efficient and avoids explaining basic accessibility concepts Claude already knows. The rule categories are presented as concise bullet points. Minor verbosity in the 'When to Use' section which partially overlaps with the rule categories, and the priority table could be considered slightly redundant with the section headers. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The common fixes section provides concrete, executable HTML before/after examples covering three key patterns. The rules themselves are specific and actionable (e.g., 'icon-only buttons must have aria-label'). However, most rules are stated as guidelines rather than executable code, and more fix examples for categories like focus trapping or aria-live would strengthen it. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The skill clearly sequences work by priority (critical → high → medium → low), provides a clear review workflow (fix critical first, quote snippets, propose small fixes), and the invocation section explains the two usage modes with expected output format. However, there's no explicit validation/verification step after applying fixes (e.g., 'test with screen reader' or 'run axe-core audit'), which is a minor gap for a review-oriented skill. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear sections, a priority table for quick scanning, and logical grouping of rules. For a standalone skill with no bundle files, the length (~120 lines) is reasonable and doesn't need splitting. Minor improvement could come from separating the full rule reference into a companion file, keeping SKILL.md as just the quick reference and common fixes. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |