Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean reference that provides executable fixes and a clear review workflow without over-explaining known concepts. It scores solidly across all dimensions with only minor room for tightening and broader example coverage.
Suggestions
Consolidate the "rule categories by priority" table and the "quick reference" section to remove the duplicated category listing and tighten conciseness.
Add one or two more concrete before/after code examples (e.g., will-change promotion, IntersectionObserver pause) to broaden actionability coverage.
Make the review-mode workflow's checkpoints more explicit (e.g., a numbered enforce-then-report sequence) to push workflow clarity toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with terse bullet rules and a compact glossary, assuming Claude's competence; the only redundancy is the "rule categories by priority" table restating categories later expanded in "quick reference". | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable CSS and JS examples (transform vs width, scroll-timeline, FLIP measurement) and directive rules, with minor gaps in coverage of additional cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The review mode defines a clear output structure (violations, why it matters, concrete fix) and "review guidance" sequences enforcement, with most checkpoints present; not a destructive/batch skill so the validation cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; content is a single well-organized file with clear section headers and appropriately self-contained material, with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |