CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

fp-option-ref

Quick reference for Option type. Use when user needs to handle nullable values, optional data, or wants to avoid null checks.

64

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/fp-option-ref/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is fp-option-ref in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is an excellent quick-reference skill that is maximally concise, fully actionable, and well-structured. It provides exactly what Claude needs to help users with fp-ts Option types without any unnecessary explanation or padding. The progression from basic operations to common patterns is logical and the code examples are complete and executable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Extremely lean and efficient. Every token serves a purpose - no explanations of what Option is beyond the one-line definition, no unnecessary library comparisons, no verbose descriptions. Assumes Claude knows TypeScript and FP concepts.

5 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable TypeScript code examples covering creation, transformation, extraction, and common patterns. The examples are copy-paste ready with proper imports and realistic use cases like safe property access.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

This is a single-purpose reference skill (not a multi-step process), and the content is clearly sequenced from creation → transformation → extraction → patterns → comparison. No destructive or batch operations requiring validation checkpoints.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

For a concise reference skill under 50 lines with no need for external files, the content is well-organized with clear section headers that enable quick navigation. No content needs to be split out.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description provides a clear 'when' clause with reasonable trigger terms but lacks specificity about what concrete information or actions the skill provides beyond being a 'quick reference.' It would benefit from listing specific capabilities (e.g., pattern matching, common methods, conversions) and narrowing the scope to reduce overlap with related error-handling or type-safety skills.

Suggestions

Add concrete actions/content the skill covers, e.g., 'Covers Option creation, pattern matching with Some/None, common methods (map, unwrap, unwrap_or), and conversion to Result type.'

Include more natural trigger terms and synonyms users might use, such as 'Some', 'None', 'unwrap', 'Optional', or the specific language (Rust, Scala, etc.) to improve both trigger quality and distinctiveness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (Option type) but actions are minimal and generic — 'handle nullable values' and 'avoid null checks' are vague descriptions of what the skill actually does. No concrete actions like 'pattern match', 'unwrap', 'map/flatMap', or 'convert to Result' are mentioned.

2 / 5

Completeness

Has both 'what' (quick reference for Option type) and 'when' (Use when user needs to handle nullable values, optional data, or wants to avoid null checks). The 'what' is somewhat thin — 'quick reference' is vague about actual capabilities — but the 'when' clause is explicit with concrete trigger phrases.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes some relevant keywords like 'Option type', 'nullable values', 'optional data', and 'null checks', but misses common variations users might say such as 'Some/None', 'unwrap', 'Option<T>', 'Maybe', 'pattern matching on Option', or specific language contexts (Rust, Scala, etc.).

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The mention of 'Option type' provides some specificity, but 'nullable values' and 'null checks' could overlap with skills about null safety, Result types, error handling, or general type system references. Without specifying a language or more precise scope, there's moderate overlap risk.

3 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.