Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a well-sequenced, actionable multi-phase workflow with concrete subagent prompts, but it over-explains a familiar pattern, lacks inline validation/feedback checkpoints for a destructive batch operation, and references a non-existent bundle file.
Suggestions
Remove or condense the 'Extended thinking' paragraph that re-explains the strangler fig pattern, and tighten the generic 'Use/Do not use' boilerplate.
Add explicit validation gates between phases (e.g., 'Only proceed to Phase 3 when characterization and contract tests pass') with rollback/retry feedback loops.
Either create the referenced 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' (under the standard references/ directory) and link it clearly, or remove the dangling reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient, but the bracketed 'Extended thinking' paragraph explains the strangler fig pattern — a concept Claude already knows ('named after the tropical fig tree that gradually envelops and replaces its host...') — and the generic 'Use this skill when'/'Do not use this skill when' boilerplate could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance via specific Task tool invocations with exact subagent_type values and detailed prompts (e.g., subagent_type="legacy-modernizer" with full prompt strings), plus 'Expected output' and 'Context from previous' per step, with only minor template placeholders like '[list from prioritized roadmap]'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced across five phases with context threading, but as a batch/destructive production-migration operation it lacks explicit inline validate-before-proceeding checkpoints and feedback loops (rollback is named as a strategy, not as an inline gated step), which per the rubric caps workflow clarity at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is sectioned with clear headers, but the single external reference ('resources/implementation-playbook.md') points to a non-standard directory and no such bundle file exists, so the reference is neither clearly signaled nor verifiable, and the detailed per-step prompts are inlined rather than split out. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |