CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

free-tool-strategy

You are an expert in engineering-as-marketing strategy. Your goal is to help plan and evaluate free tools that generate leads, attract organic traffic, and build brand awareness.

44

Quality

45%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/free-tool-strategy/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is free-tool-strategy in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

42%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-organized strategy reference with several genuinely actionable artifacts (scorecard, ROI formula, output template), but it is overlong, padded with obvious enumerations, lacks an explicit sequenced workflow with checkpoints, and keeps all reference material inlined in one file. Tightening the prose and splitting reference catalogs into bundle files would lift the weaker dimensions.

Suggestions

Cut the padded "Why they work" truisms and the Example Tool Concepts by Business Type section, or move them to a references/ file, to improve conciseness and progressive disclosure.

Add an explicit numbered workflow (e.g., 1. Assess context → 2. Ideate → 3. Validate with scorecard → 4. Scope MVP → 5. Plan capture & promotion → 6. Project ROI) with a checkpoint after validation, to raise workflow clarity.

Lead with the actionable artifacts (scorecard, Output Format template, ROI projection) near the top and push the descriptive catalogs into referenced files so the overview stays lean.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~570-line body is noticeably verbose with several padded sections that explain concepts Claude already knows (e.g., the six Tool Types each listing five examples plus truisms like "Personalized output, High perceived value, Share-worthy results", and Example Tool Concepts by Business Type), fitting anchor 2 rather than the mostly-efficient anchor 3.

2 / 5

Actionability

It offers genuinely concrete tools (a fill-in Output Format template, an 8-factor 1-5 scorecard with scoring bands, an ROI projection formula, and specific ideation/validation questions), but these are diluted by a large volume of abstract principles and enumeration, fitting anchor 3's "some concrete guidance but incomplete."

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sections follow a discernible sequence (assess → ideate → validate → build vs buy → MVP → promote → measure → evaluate), but there are no explicit numbered steps, validation checkpoints, or feedback loops tying the process together, matching anchor 3's "sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit."

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and the skill is a single ~570-line file with clear headers but inlined reference-like material (the tool-type catalog and examples-by-business-type) that could live in separate files, fitting anchor 3's "some structure but content that should be separate is inline."

3 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Description

48%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description states a clear purpose and carves out a distinct niche, but it is written in second person and omits any explicit "Use when..." trigger guidance, capping completeness and lowering specificity. Adding third-person voice and concrete trigger phrases would materially raise the score.

Suggestions

Rewrite in third person (e.g., "Plans and evaluates free tools that generate leads...") instead of "You are an expert... Your goal is to help..." to recover the specificity penalty.

Add an explicit trigger clause such as "Use when planning a free tool / lead-generation tool, or when the user mentions engineering-as-marketing, free tools, or lead-magnet strategy."

Include natural synonyms users would say (e.g., "lead magnet", "free calculator", "tool-based SEO") to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (engineering-as-marketing / free tools) and two concrete actions ("plan and evaluate" free tools), matching the anchor-3 example, but the description is written in second person ("You are an expert... Your goal is to help..."), which the guidelines penalize by reducing specificity by 1, dropping it to 2.

2 / 5

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does ("help plan and evaluate free tools that generate leads, attract organic traffic, and build brand awareness") but provides no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance; per the guidelines a missing explicit trigger caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Contains relevant natural keywords ("free tools", "generate leads", "organic traffic", "brand awareness") but mixes in jargon ("engineering-as-marketing") and lacks the common variations/synonyms a user would naturally say, fitting the anchor-3 "some relevant keywords but missing common variations."

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The "engineering-as-marketing / free tools for lead generation" niche is specific and largely distinct, with only minor overlap risk against broader marketing/SEO skills, matching anchor 4; it is not a 5 because the triggers are not crisply differentiated.

4 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (583 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.