CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

freshservice-automation

Automate Freshservice ITSM tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): create/update tickets, bulk operations, service requests, and outbound emails. Always search tools first for current schemas.

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/freshservice-automation/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Highly actionable, well-organized reference material with concrete tool schemas and pitfalls throughout. The main weaknesses are the absence of validation/verification checkpoints around the batch bulk-update workflow and some redundant repetition of the status/priority code tables.

Suggestions

Add validation steps around bulk updates: verify the listed ticket IDs with FRESHSERVICE_GET_TICKET (or a filtered list) before updating, and confirm the count of successful updates in the response before proceeding.

Deduplicate the status/priority code mappings — keep them once in the Common Patterns tables and reference that from workflow 2 and the Known Pitfalls section.

Replace the empty 'When to Use' section with concrete applicability guidance (e.g. which workflows apply for incidents vs. service requests) or remove it.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense with tables, exact parameters, and pitfalls, and doesn't explain concepts Claude already knows, but status/priority code mappings are repeated three times across sections and the 'When to Use' section is contentless filler that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Every workflow names exact tools (e.g. FRESHSERVICE_BULK_UPDATE_TICKETS) with fully enumerated parameters, enums, defaults, and ranges, plus a concrete date-range example and a quick-reference table — directly executable guidance covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sequences are clearly laid out ('When to use' plus numbered tool sequences, and setup requires confirming the connection is ACTIVE), but the batch bulk-update workflow lacks validation checkpoints — no verify-IDs-before-update step and no confirm-results-after loop beyond a pitfall hint to 'check response for individual results' — which caps this dimension.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single-file skill (no bundle files) with well-organized headed sections per workflow and a quick-reference summary at the end; content is appropriately sized for one file with only minor organization gaps such as duplicated code-reference sections.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, third-person description with concrete actions and strong distinctiveness, but it lacks any explicit 'when to use this skill' trigger clause and misses a few natural synonyms like 'helpdesk' or 'incident'.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user mentions Freshservice, ITSM tickets, service requests, or helpdesk tasks'.

Include natural synonyms such as 'helpdesk', 'service desk', and 'incident' to broaden trigger coverage.

Mention searching/listing tickets among the enumerated actions for full coverage of the skill's workflows.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists several concrete actions — 'create/update tickets, bulk operations, service requests, and outbound emails' — but omits listing/searching tickets, a core workflow in the body, so coverage has minor gaps rather than being comprehensive.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear and concrete (automating Freshservice ITSM via Rube MCP with enumerated actions), but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance — the trailing 'Always search tools first for current schemas' is an operating instruction, not a when-to-use statement, so completeness is capped.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms users would say are present ('Freshservice', 'ITSM', 'tickets', 'service requests', 'outbound emails'), but common synonyms like 'helpdesk', 'service desk', or 'incident' are missing, so coverage is good rather than comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Freshservice ITSM ... via Rube MCP (Composio)' names a specific product and toolchain, giving a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

Path

skills/freshservice-automation/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.