Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sectioned, reasonably concise overview of Haskell expertise areas with a decent numbered approach list, but it lacks executable examples and its single external reference points to a nonexistent file.
Suggestions
Replace the generic Instructions bullets with concrete, actionable guidance (e.g. specific GHCi snippets, Cabal/Stack commands, or a total-function rewrite pattern).
Either create `resources/implementation-playbook.md` with the promised examples or remove the dangling reference.
Turn the Approach principles into a genuine workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (e.g. compile-check, QuickCheck run) rather than a list of design heuristics.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean bullet lists, but the "Use this skill when"/"Do not use" sections and generic Instructions bullets ("Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes") are filler that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Focus Areas name concrete libraries and concepts (GADTs, STM, Aeson, Megaparsec) and the Approach is a numbered list, but there is no executable code or concrete commands, and the Instructions section is high-level. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Approach is a numbered 1-7 list giving some sequence, but the entries are design principles rather than an ordered workflow, and there are no explicit validation checkpoints. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly organized and there is a one-level-deep, signaled reference ("open `resources/implementation-playbook.md`"), but that referenced file does not exist in any bundle directory, leaving a dead pointer. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |