Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-organized, concise overview that delegates detail to real one-level-deep reference files, with concrete actionable HIG guidance and a clear question-then-output workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: ten one-sentence principles, a reference table, and brief output/question lists with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, though the footer credit and the generic 'When to Use' line are minor trimmable fluff. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is concrete and specific (e.g. 'destructive button style (red text)', 'cancel appears at the bottom, separated', 'Button labels should be specific verbs'), with only minor gaps in coverage of edge cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence exists (clarifying Questions to Ask, then a four-part Output Format), but it is an advisory skill without validation checkpoints, so it stops short of the explicit feedback-loop structure of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a well-signaled Reference Index table linking one level deep to five real reference files, each annotated with topic and key content, making navigation easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |