Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, lean overview that appropriately offloads detail to three real one-level-deep reference files and provides concrete HIG guidance with a clear output structure. Minor gains are available from trimming boilerplate and naming concrete framework APIs.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean — short bolded principles with brief HIG-specific rationale and a reference table — with only minor trims needed (the generic 'When to Use' boilerplate and the Raintree footer add little). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance is given (determinate vs indeterminate, 'longer than a second or two', 'Use HealthKit APIs', ring color conventions), though it stops short of naming concrete SwiftUI/UIKit components like ProgressView or UIProgressView. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Output Format' section gives a clear sequence of deliverables and 'Questions to Ask' frames discovery; no destructive/batch operation requires validation checkpoints, so the absence of explicit checkpoints is acceptable. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview with a well-signaled Reference Index table linking three real one-level-deep reference files (progress-indicators.md, status-bars.md, activity-rings.md, all confirmed present in ./references/), making navigation easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |