Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured overview that delegates detail to a comprehensive, verified reference index and gives concrete, actionable pattern-selection guidance. Its main weaknesses are a terse/generic description-driven entry and minor boilerplate padding rather than any structural defect.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficiently organized as concise principle bullets, a compact reference index, and a selection table without explaining concepts Claude already knows; only the marketing footer and generic 'When to Use' boilerplate are trimmable padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance is given — quantified rules ('Three screens max'), a user-goal-to-pattern table mapping goals to recommended patterns and anti-patterns, plus an explicit output format — though it is advisory rather than executable code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Output Format gives a clear 4-step sequence (recommend pattern with rationale → step-by-step implementation → platform variations → common pitfalls) supported by a Questions-to-Ask intake step; no validation checkpoints, but none are required for an advisory skill. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview with a well-signaled one-level-deep reference index of 25 references (all verified present in references/), each with topic and key-content columns, making navigation easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |