Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and provides a clear routing workflow with specific file mappings, scoring well on token efficiency and clarity. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: every referenced guideline file is missing from the bundle, leaving the actionable detail inaccessible.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced examples/ files (3p-updates.md, company-newsletter.md, faq-answers.md, general-comms.md) or remove the file-based routing and inline minimal guidance for each communication type.
Add a brief fallback note describing what to do if a guideline file is absent, so the workflow degrades gracefully.
Consider inlining one or two lines of concrete formatting/tone guidance per communication type so the skill remains useful even before the example files are loaded.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with short sections and bullet lists, never explaining what a newsletter or FAQ is and assuming Claude's competence; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It maps each communication type to a specific file and gives a concrete numbered routing procedure, but the executable detail is delegated to examples/*.md files that are not present in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (identify type, load guideline, follow instructions) plus a fallback branch for unmatched types; minor gap in that it does not address what to do if a referenced file is missing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The overview properly signals one-level-deep references to examples/*.md, but that directory does not exist in the bundle, so the navigation leads nowhere despite the sound structural design. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |