Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, information-rich instruction skill whose per-tool details, pitfalls, and quick reference make it genuinely actionable. Its weaknesses are redundancy — rate limits, pagination, and status handling each stated twice — plus a filler closing section, and the absence of example tool-call payloads.
Suggestions
Deduplicate: state rate limits, pagination mechanics, and status validation once (in Common Patterns or Known Pitfalls) and remove their repeats from individual workflow Pitfalls.
Delete the tautological 'When to Use' section ('This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview') and the duplicated prose paragraph in Setup.
Add one concrete example tool-call payload (e.g., the arguments object for KLAVIYO_GET_CAMPAIGNS with channel, filter, and page_cursor) to make the most common workflow copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with Klaviyo-specific facts (tool slugs, parameters, rate limits, nesting shapes) that Claude cannot know, but it repeats the same facts in multiple places: rate limits appear in the tag and send-job pitfalls and again under Known Pitfalls; pagination guidance appears in workflow 1 and again in the Pagination section; status case-sensitivity and client-side validation appear twice; and the closing 'When to Use' line ('This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview') is pure filler. This fits 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than the clearly verbose anchor 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete throughout: exact tool slugs, parameter names with example values (e.g. 'equals(status,"draft")', 'fields__campaign__message=[content.subject, ...]'), a sample campaign ID, and a Quick Reference table mapping tasks to tools. It stops short of anchor 5 only because no concrete example tool-call payloads (argument JSON per call) are shown for the common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each workflow has a 'When to use' clause, a sequenced tool list labeled [Prerequisite]/[Required], and explicit checkpoints exist ('Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE before running any workflows', 'Follow page_cursor until exhausted', 'Implement backoff on 429 responses'). The workflows are simple 1-2 step lookups, so they lack the explicit validate-then-proceed loop structure of anchor 5, and the setup section repeats its instructions as both prose and a numbered list. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is a single file, so there are no nested or buried references to penalize; section structure is good (Prerequisites, Setup, five workflows, Common Patterns, Known Pitfalls, Quick Reference). It sits at anchor 4 rather than 5 because the per-tool parameter and pitfall detail (~180 lines) could be split into a reference file, and the duplicate Known Pitfalls section plus the vacuous 'When to Use' section are minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |