Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured strategy skill with concrete, actionable guidance and excellent progressive disclosure into two relevant reference files. The main improvements are trimming generically-known principles and the duplicated question sections, and adding a brief worked example to make the output format fully concrete.
Suggestions
Trim the "Lead Magnet Principles" section to the few judgment calls Claude would not already make (e.g., the <30-minute consumability threshold and the one-format rule), cutting generic bullets like "works on mobile".
Merge "Task-Specific Questions" into "Before Planning" to remove duplication of the context-gathering list.
Add a compact worked example (one-line business context → chosen format, gate, and first A/B test) to make the five-part output format concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is table-heavy and dense with domain-specific data (format effort/time estimates, benchmarks, gating trade-offs) that earns its tokens. Minor over-explanation remains: "Lead Magnet Principles" states fairly generic marketing wisdom, and "Task-Specific Questions" largely duplicates the "Before Planning" context list — trimmable, so it sits at anchor 4 rather than the lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only strategy skill the guidance is concrete throughout: named formats with effort estimates, example lead-magnet titles per buyer stage, specific A/B test pairs, a six-element landing page structure, and a five-part output format. It falls short of anchor 5 only in lacking a worked end-to-end example of applying the framework to a sample business. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The section ordering forms a coherent planning sequence (gather context — with an explicit check for product-marketing-context.md first — then format selection, gating, delivery, promotion, measurement, output format). The measurement section provides post-hoc feedback signals, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints mid-workflow, keeping it below anchor 5; the sequence is clearer than anchor 3's implicit-checkpoint example. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a genuine overview and pushes detail into two real, clearly signaled, one-level-deep references: "For detailed creation guidance per format: See [references/format-guide.md]" and "For detailed benchmarks by format and industry: See [references/benchmarks.md]". Both files exist and hold the appropriate split-out content (per-format creation guides; benchmark tables), matching the anchor 5 example structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |