Content
32%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sectioned stub: it stays lean but offers no actionable prompt-engineering guidance, only generic directives plus a dangling reference to a nonexistent playbook file. Claude loading this skill would gain essentially no domain-specific instructions.
Suggestions
Inline at least one concrete before/after prompt example (e.g. a weak instruction transformed into a structured prompt with role, constraints, and output format) so the skill delivers value without external files.
Replace the abstract instruction bullets with a concrete step sequence and an explicit validation checkpoint (e.g. "rewrite the prompt, then test it against the stated success criteria and iterate if it fails").
Either create `resources/implementation-playbook.md` with the promised detailed patterns and examples, or remove the dangling reference; also drop the duplicated description line and the unverified 40%/30%/50-80% statistics.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and mostly efficient, but the opening line duplicates the frontmatter description verbatim, the Context section is unverified marketing statistics ("improve accuracy by 40%, reduce hallucinations by 30%, cut costs by 50-80%"), and the 'Do not use this skill when' bullets are vacuous ("The task is unrelated to prompt optimization"). This matches anchor 3: mostly efficient with some unnecessary content that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The Instructions are pure high-level hints ("Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs. Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.") with no concrete technique, example, or command — matching anchor 2. The single substantive pointer, `resources/implementation-playbook.md`, targets a file that does not exist in the bundle, so no concrete guidance is actually reachable. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough implicit sequence exists (clarify → apply best practices → validate → deliver), but the steps are poorly defined generic directives with no checkpoints or error-handling, matching anchor 2 ("rough sequence present but many gaps; steps poorly defined; validation absent"). Not 3: anchor 3 requires concrete listed steps; these are abstractions, and 'validate outcomes' names no actual check. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized and the playbook reference is clearly signaled in a Resources section, but the referenced `resources/implementation-playbook.md` does not exist (no resources/, references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories are present), its mention is duplicated in Instructions, and it uses a nonstandard path. All substance is deferred to a dead end, matching anchor 2. Not 3: the reference isn't merely imperfectly signaled — following it fails entirely. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 9 / 20 Passed |