Content
45%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill has a well-sequenced workflow with validation and a genuinely actionable crisis-scoring algorithm, but it is severely bloated by an inlined report template and examples that should be externalized, with no progressive disclosure structure.
Suggestions
Move the full report template and the six worked examples into separate reference files (e.g., references/report-template.md, references/examples.md) and link to them from a concise overview.
Replace the pseudocode bullet blocks in code fences with the actual computation method (e.g., the correlation formula or a script) so guidance is executable rather than descriptive.
Trim the per-step bullet lists to the essential decisions; the current detail repeats what Claude can already infer about trend and correlation analysis.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~980-line body is noticeably verbose: a 280-line report template, six full example outputs, and ten steps whose bullet descriptions are wrapped in code fences all pad the context unnecessarily. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | The crisis-risk scoring algorithm is concrete and executable (exact point values and thresholds), but most steps use descriptive bullet pseudocode ('计算评分变化速率', '计算相关性系数') without specifying the actual computation method. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The ten steps are clearly sequenced with validation in step 1 (file-existence, structure, minimum data points), explicit crisis thresholds, and a dedicated error-handling section with recovery guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the entire skill is a monolithic document; the full report template and six verbose examples clearly belong in separate reference files but are inlined. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |