CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

micro-saas-launcher

You ship fast and iterate. You know the difference between a side project and a business. You've seen what works in the indie hacker community. You help people go from idea to paying customers in weeks, not years. You focus on sustainable, profitable businesses - not unicorn hunting.

31

Quality

24%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/micro-saas-launcher/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

38%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill provides a broad overview of micro-SaaS launching with some useful frameworks (validation checklist, pricing heuristics, tech stack recommendations), but suffers from verbosity, lack of truly executable content, and poor progressive disclosure. The code fences are misleadingly labeled as JavaScript when they contain markdown/plain text, the anti-patterns section is padded with obvious advice Claude already knows, and several internal references point to non-existent sections.

Suggestions

Remove redundant explanations Claude already knows (e.g., what pricing tiers are, why feature creep is bad) and condense anti-patterns into a compact table rather than verbose multi-line blocks.

Replace the misleadingly-labeled JavaScript code blocks with actual executable code snippets (e.g., a real Next.js API route, a Stripe checkout integration snippet) or remove the language label.

Either create the referenced bundle files (Distribution First, Fixing Churn, Market Selection, Simple Pricing) or remove the broken references in the Sharp Edges table.

Add explicit validation checkpoints to the MVP Speed Run workflow, such as 'verify Stripe test payment works before Day 7' and 'confirm at least N waitlist signups before proceeding to Week 2.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is noticeably verbose with significant redundancy. The role description is repeated from the frontmatter. Lists of anti-patterns use multi-line formatting that could be condensed. Tables explaining basic concepts (like what pricing tiers are) over-explain things Claude already knows. The 'When to Use' section at the bottom is completely vacuous.

2 / 5

Actionability

Provides some concrete guidance like specific tech stack recommendations, a 2-week timeline, and pricing frameworks with examples. However, code blocks are labeled as JavaScript but contain markdown tables and plain text—not executable code. The guidance is more strategic/advisory than truly actionable with copy-paste ready commands or code.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The MVP Speed Run provides a day-by-day sequence and the Idea Validation section has a reasonable framework. However, there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops—no steps like 'verify Stripe integration works before moving on' or 'if pre-sales fail, pivot before building.' For a workflow involving building and launching a product (which has destructive time-cost implications), the lack of explicit validation gates is a notable gap.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Everything is inlined in a single monolithic file with no bundle files or references to external documents. The Sharp Edges section references items like '## Distribution First' and '## Fixing Churn' that don't exist anywhere, creating broken internal references. The Related Skills section mentions skills but provides no links. Content like the full pricing strategy and MVP stack details could benefit from being split into separate reference files.

2 / 5

Total

10

/

20

Passed

Description

11%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description reads as a persona statement or marketing pitch rather than a functional skill description. It uses second person voice ('You ship fast'), lacks any concrete actions or capabilities, has no 'Use when...' clause, and provides almost no information that would help Claude select this skill appropriately from a list of alternatives.

Suggestions

Replace the persona-style language with concrete actions in third person (e.g., 'Helps validate business ideas, design MVPs, create pricing strategies, and plan launches for indie hackers and solo founders').

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms (e.g., 'Use when the user mentions indie hacking, side projects, bootstrapping, MVPs, launching a product, or finding paying customers').

Remove motivational fluff like 'You've seen what works' and 'not unicorn hunting' and replace with specific, distinguishable capabilities that differentiate this skill from general business or startup advice skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description uses entirely vague, motivational language ('ship fast', 'iterate', 'go from idea to paying customers') with no concrete actions. There are no specific capabilities listed—no mention of what the skill actually does (e.g., generate landing pages, write marketing copy, validate ideas).

1 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is extremely vague—it never specifies what concrete actions the skill performs. There is no 'when' clause or any explicit trigger guidance. The description reads like a persona bio rather than a functional skill description.

1 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Contains a couple of relevant keywords like 'indie hacker' and 'paying customers,' but most of the language is abstract motivational phrasing rather than natural terms a user would type. Missing concrete trigger terms like 'MVP', 'launch', 'pricing', 'landing page', 'side project', 'SaaS', 'validate idea'.

2 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description is very broad and could overlap with any business, startup, entrepreneurship, or product development skill. 'Indie hacker' provides some niche identity, but the lack of concrete actions means it could easily conflict with general business advice or product management skills.

2 / 5

Total

6

/

20

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.