CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

minecraft-bukkit-pro

Master Minecraft server plugin development with Bukkit, Spigot, and Paper APIs.

34

Quality

30%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/minecraft-bukkit-pro/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is minecraft-bukkit-pro in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

21%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill reads as a high-level capability description or persona prompt rather than an actionable skill. It extensively lists topics and principles Claude already knows (design patterns, SOLID, style guides) without providing any concrete code examples, specific API usage, or executable commands for Minecraft plugin development. The content would benefit enormously from replacing the abstract listings with concrete, copy-paste-ready code examples for common Bukkit/Paper tasks.

Suggestions

Replace abstract topic listings with concrete, executable code examples—e.g., a basic event listener registration, a Brigadier command setup, an inventory GUI creation pattern with actual Bukkit/Paper API calls.

Remove generic software engineering advice (SOLID, Google Java Style Guide, builder pattern, repository pattern) that Claude already knows, and focus on Minecraft-specific knowledge that Claude wouldn't have.

Add a concrete workflow with validation steps for common tasks like 'creating a new plugin from scratch' or 'adding a custom event', including build commands (e.g., `gradle shadowJar`) and testing steps (e.g., MockBukkit test example).

Populate the referenced `resources/implementation-playbook.md` with detailed examples and add additional reference files for specific topics (e.g., NMS patterns, cross-version compatibility snippets, Paper vs Spigot API differences).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is heavily padded with concepts Claude already knows well—SOLID principles, Google Java Style Guide, builder patterns, dependency injection, repository pattern, etc. These are generic software engineering concepts that don't need to be listed. The 'Core Expertise' section reads like a resume rather than actionable instructions. Much of the content is categorical listing without adding value.

2 / 5

Actionability

Despite claiming to be about Minecraft plugin development, there is zero executable code, no concrete commands, no specific API usage examples, no code snippets showing event listeners, command registration, or any Bukkit/Paper API calls. Everything is abstract description—'Event-driven architecture with listener priorities' tells Claude nothing it doesn't already know and provides no concrete guidance on how to implement anything.

1 / 5

Workflow Clarity

There is a rough implied sequence in 'Project Analysis → Implementation Strategy → Quality Standards' but no concrete steps, no validation checkpoints, no feedback loops. The 'Implementation Strategy' section lists abstract principles ('Start with minimal viable functionality') rather than actionable workflow steps. No verification or testing commands are provided.

2 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill references `resources/implementation-playbook.md` for detailed examples, which is a good progressive disclosure pattern. However, no bundle files are provided, so this reference is unverifiable. The content itself is a monolithic list of topics without clear navigation to deeper resources. The single reference is insufficient given the breadth of topics covered.

3 / 5

Total

8

/

20

Passed

Description

39%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a clear niche (Minecraft server plugin development) and names specific APIs, which aids distinctiveness. However, it lacks concrete actions describing what the skill actually does and entirely omits a 'when to use' clause, making it difficult for Claude to reliably select this skill. The imperative 'Master' framing is also unusual and doesn't convey specific capabilities.

Suggestions

Add concrete actions describing what the skill does, e.g., 'Creates Bukkit/Spigot/Paper plugins, registers event listeners, defines custom commands, configures plugin.yml files.'

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with trigger terms, e.g., 'Use when the user asks about Minecraft server plugins, Bukkit API, Spigot development, Paper plugins, or creating server-side Minecraft mods.'

Replace the vague 'Master' framing with third-person active verbs describing capabilities, e.g., 'Develops and debugs Minecraft server plugins...'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (Minecraft server plugin development) and mentions specific APIs (Bukkit, Spigot, Paper), but describes no concrete actions — 'Master...development' is vague and doesn't specify what the skill actually does (e.g., create plugins, configure event listeners, set up commands).

2 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is vague ('Master...plugin development' doesn't describe concrete capabilities), and there is no 'when' clause at all. The absence of explicit trigger guidance caps this dimension, and the weak 'what' further lowers the score.

2 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant keywords like 'Minecraft', 'Bukkit', 'Spigot', 'Paper', 'plugin', and 'server', which users would naturally mention. However, it misses common variations and related terms like 'mod', 'event handler', 'commands', 'permissions', 'YAML config', or 'PaperMC'.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of Minecraft server plugins with specific API names (Bukkit, Spigot, Paper) creates a fairly distinct niche. Minor overlap risk exists with general Java development or broader Minecraft modding skills (e.g., Forge/Fabric), but the specific API mentions help differentiate.

4 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.