CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

mixpanel-automation

Automate Mixpanel tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): events, segmentation, funnels, cohorts, user profiles, JQL queries. Always search tools first for current schemas.

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/mixpanel-automation/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is mixpanel-automation in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-organized, information-dense, and actionable, with concrete tool slugs, parameters, expression syntax, and per-workflow pitfalls that assume Claude's competence rather than teaching basics. The main weaknesses are the missing validation/verify loop around the batch profile-update workflow and redundant repetition of date-format and expression-syntax rules across sections.

Suggestions

Add a validation loop to the profile-update workflow: query profiles with QUERY_PROFILES to confirm the target set before MIXPANEL_PROFILE_BATCH_UPDATE, then re-query to verify the changes applied — this also lifts the workflow_clarity cap.

Deduplicate repeated guidance: state the 'YYYY-MM-DD' date rule and the properties["name"] expression syntax once in 'Known Pitfalls' and remove them from individual workflow pitfall lists.

Delete the empty 'When to Use' section ('This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.') — it adds tokens without information — and consider moving the quick-reference table and expression-syntax guide into a references/ file to keep SKILL.md a leaner overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient — tool sequences, parameter lists, and pitfalls are terse and information-dense — but there is noticeable redundancy: the 'YYYY-MM-DD' date-format rule is repeated in nearly every workflow's pitfalls and again under 'Known Pitfalls', the expression syntax (properties["name"] == value) appears in both 'Common Patterns' and 'Known Pitfalls', and the closing 'When to Use' section ('This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.') is pure filler. This matches the anchor 'Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'; it is not a 2 because there is no concept-explanation padding and most sections earn their tokens.

3 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is concrete and executable in the MCP context: exact tool slugs (MIXPANEL_QUERY_SEGMENTATION, MIXPANEL_PROFILE_BATCH_UPDATE), exact parameter names and formats, copy-paste-ready expression examples (properties["country"] == "US"), and step-by-step ID resolution patterns. This matches the anchor 'Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'. It falls short of 5 because no literal example tool call (e.g., a sample request payload) is shown, leaving the exact call shape implicit.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Each workflow has a 'When to use', a numbered tool sequence with [Prerequisite]/[Required] tags, and the setup steps include verification checkpoints ('Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE before running any workflows'). However, the skill includes a batch write operation (MIXPANEL_PROFILE_BATCH_UPDATE) with no validation step — there is no guidance to verify targets with QUERY_PROFILES before writing or to re-query afterwards to confirm the update. Per the guideline that missing validation in batch/destructive operations caps workflow clarity at 3, this matches the anchor 'Steps listed but validation gaps; sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit'.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The single SKILL.md is well structured with clear section headers, per-workflow subsections, and a quick-reference table, and it references no files (so no dead or nested references). This matches the anchor 'Good structure; most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps'. It is not a 5 because at ~220 lines the reference material (expression syntax guide, quick-reference table, JQL notes) could be split into one-level-deep reference files to keep SKILL.md a leaner overview.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinctive, clearly scoping the skill to Mixpanel analytics via Rube MCP with a good set of natural domain keywords. Its main weakness is the missing 'Use when...' trigger clause, which both caps completeness and slightly weakens its usefulness for automatic skill selection.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to analyze Mixpanel data, track events, inspect funnels or cohorts, or manage Mixpanel user profiles.'

Convert the bare noun list into concrete verbs for sharper capability framing, e.g., 'aggregate event counts, run segmentation and funnel queries, list cohorts, query and batch-update user profiles, execute JQL'.

Include a few more natural user phrasings such as 'product analytics', 'retention', or 'Mixpanel reports' to broaden trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("Automate Mixpanel tasks via Rube MCP (Composio)") and lists six concrete capability areas ("events, segmentation, funnels, cohorts, user profiles, JQL queries"), which matches the anchor 'Lists several specific actions; minor gaps in coverage'. It falls short of a 5 because the items are bare nouns without concrete verbs (e.g., 'aggregate event counts', 'query funnels') and coverage gaps exist (no mention of retention, dashboards, or insights beyond 'JQL queries').

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (automating Mixpanel events, segmentation, funnels, cohorts, profiles, and JQL), but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance — the final sentence 'Always search tools first for current schemas' is a usage instruction, not a when-to-use trigger. Per the guideline that a missing explicit trigger clause caps completeness at 3, this matches the anchor 'Has a clear what but when is missing or only weakly implied'.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The description contains natural Mixpanel vocabulary users would say — "events", "segmentation", "funnels", "cohorts", "user profiles", "JQL queries" — matching the anchor 'Good keyword coverage; a few natural terms missing'. It is not a 5 because common user phrasings like 'product analytics', 'retention', 'reports', or 'Mixpanel dashboards' are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description occupies a clear niche — Mixpanel product analytics via a named integration (Rube MCP/Composio) — with distinct trigger terms (Mixpanel, funnels, cohorts, JQL) that are unlikely to fire for any other skill, matching the anchor 'Clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk'.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

Path

plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/mixpanel-automation/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.