Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured overview with an explicit, validation-rich workflow and clean progressive disclosure to real reference files. The only gaps are minor: a couple of repeated reference links and an incomplete inline JSON stub that defers to bundle files for the full template.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (no padding about what Obsidian or JSON is), but repeats references — analysis-workflow.md is linked twice in step 3 and logic.md appears in both step 5 and Output Format — minor trim opportunities that keep it just below the 'every token earns its place' anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps give concrete executable guidance ('Read Bases/*.base', 'Use WebFetch to retrieve page content', 'Analyze the HTML for Schema.org JSON, Meta tags, and CSS selectors') with REQUIRED markers, but the inline JSON example is an incomplete stub (`...`) relying on assets/json-schema.md for the full template, leaving a minor gap versus copy-paste-ready anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step numbered workflow has explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops — 'Verify each selector against the fetched content' and 'If a selector cannot be verified... ask for another URL' — reinforced by the Selector Verification Rules section, matching the anchor 5 example with validate→retry recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview pointing to six real one-level-deep reference files (all present in references/) plus assets/ for examples and official docs, with clearly signaled inline links and a Resources navigation section, matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |