Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction-only skill with concrete scoring systems, screening guidance, and report templates. Its main weaknesses are conciseness (repetitive scoring tables and out-of-place version/date metadata) and progressive disclosure (everything inlined with no reference files despite the length).
Suggestions
Move the detailed scoring rubrics, occupational-disease screening tables, and the full report-format template into one-level-deep reference files (e.g., references/scoring.md, references/report-template.md) and link to them from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Deduplicate the nearly identical 久坐 and 视屏终端 scoring tables (define the shared 0-10 dimension scale once) and relocate the version/last-updated metadata to a clearly marked metadata or changelog section to avoid the time-sensitive-info conciseness penalty.
Add explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoints after data reading and before report generation so the workflow's validation feedback loops are unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient domain-specific scoring data, but the久坐 and 视屏终端 scoring tables repeat near-identical structures, the output-format template is long, and a version (v1.0.0) plus date (2025-01-08) sit outside any deprecated/old-patterns section, which the rubric penalizes. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides highly concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance — exact per-dimension point values, risk thresholds (4-40, 14-26, 27-40), ergonomic 0-100 scoring, screening items with frequencies, and a full report template — with only minor placeholder gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence (读取→评估→人机工程→筛查→关联→报告) with validation in step 1 (检查文件是否存在, 验证数据结构完整性) and a dedicated 错误处理 section for missing data, insufficient data, and high-risk warnings; minor checkpoint gaps keep it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear section headers, but with no bundle files present all content — detailed scoring rubrics, screening tables, and the full output template — is inlined in a ~380-line SKILL.md rather than split into one-level-deep reference files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |