Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is dense with concrete before/after migration fixes and honest limitations, but the actual migration workflow is never sequenced — validation appears only as scattered tips with no feedback loop — and a few table rows are directional rather than actionable. Padding is minor but present in the Overview and 'How It Works' sections.
Suggestions
Replace the 'How It Works' interaction ritual with a numbered migration workflow, e.g. 1. identify the version delta from the tables, 2. apply view/Python fixes, 3. bump the manifest version, 4. run --update=your_module and fix deprecation warnings, re-running until clean.
Make vague rows actionable or drop them: state what actually changed in _render_qweb_pdf()'s signature and what 'line aggregation rules updated' means; remove the 'npm run validate' item, which is not an Odoo command.
Trim the generic Overview opening sentence about migration requiring careful handling — it restates what Claude already knows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The old→new tables and before/after code examples are dense and lean, but the generic Overview opening ('Migrating Odoo modules between major versions requires careful handling…') and the 'How It Works' invocation ritual ('Mention @odoo-migration-helper… paste your module code') are padding Claude does not need. Mostly efficient but could be tightened, matching anchor 3. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: concrete before/after fixes for attrs→inline conditions, oe_chatter→<chatter/>, website_published→is_published, plus commands like '--update=your_module' and a manifest version string. Minor gaps: rows like '_render_qweb_pdf() (same, but signature changed)' and 'Line aggregation rules updated' gesture at changes without actionable detail, and 'npm run validate' is not a real Odoo command. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The only numbered sequence (Activate→Analyze→Validate) describes the skill-usage interaction, not the migration task itself. Real checkpoints exist ('Test with --update=your_module on each version', 'never skip intermediate versions') but they are scattered as tips with no error-recovery loop, fitting anchor 3: sequence present, checkpoints missing or implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the ~96-line body is a single well-sectioned file (When to Use, per-version change tables, Examples, Best Practices, Limitations) that is easy to navigate. It is not anchor 5 because the per-version reference tables are inline and could be split into separate reference files as the skill grows. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |