Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, example-driven ORM reference with genuinely useful non-obvious guidance (date stringification, N+1 avoidance, search_count). Its main weakness is the absence of validation/verification guidance around batch write operations, plus a small amount of invocation meta-chatter that could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Add a validation step to the bulk-write example: check the affected record count first (e.g. search_count) or test the write on a single record before applying it to the full recordset, and mention wrapping multi-write operations in a savepoint for rollback.
Delete or shrink the "How It Works" section — it explains how to invoke the skill rather than teaching ORM usage.
Complete Example 2 with its imports (from odoo import api, fields, models) so it is executable standalone, matching Example 1's self-contained style.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — the Overview, Best Practices, and Limitations sections earn their tokens with non-obvious guidance (e.g. stringify dates in domains, prefer search_count). The one trimmable piece is the "How It Works" section ("Activate: Mention @odoo-orm-expert...", "Get Code: Receive correct, idiomatic Odoo ORM code"), which is meta-chatter explaining how to invoke a skill rather than ORM knowledge. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Three concrete code examples plus a do/don't best-practices list give mostly executable, copy-paste-ready guidance with good/bad contrast in Example 3. Minor gaps keep it below a 5: Example 2 omits the needed imports (from odoo import api, fields, models) and Example 1 uses an unbound partner_id. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-step "How It Works" sequence is user-facing and trivial, and no validation checkpoints exist anywhere. Example 3 performs a batch write across every partner matching a domain with no verification step (search_count sanity check, test on a subset, or rollback guidance), so the batch-operations cap applies — capping workflow clarity at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single, compact, self-contained file (~80 lines) with well-labeled sections (Overview, When to Use, Examples, Best Practices, Limitations) and no external bundle files — none are needed at this size, so navigation is trivial and content placement is appropriate, matching the simple-skill pattern for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |