CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

pricing-strategy

Design pricing, packaging, and monetization strategies based on value, customer willingness to pay, and growth objectives.

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/pricing-strategy/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is pricing-strategy in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-structured, mostly lean strategy reference with concrete frameworks and a validation checklist. It is largely actionable and well-organized as a single file, with minor room to tighten prose and add validation checkpoints to the multi-step sub-workflows.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean — tables and bullet lists for value metrics, tier counts, and WTP methods — with only minor instances of over-explanation ('Failure in any one weakens the system', the ASCII value ladder) that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete frameworks are named and operationalized (Van Westendorp questions, PMC/PME/OPP/IDP outputs, value-metric validation test, Good/Better/Best tier definitions, a 6-point validation checklist), giving mostly executable guidance with minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sections are sequenced (required context → fundamentals → research → metrics → tiers → pricing-change strategy → output) with a closing validation checklist, but the persona-packaging and price-increase steps lack explicit validation checkpoints.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained SKILL.md with well-organized numbered sections and clear navigation; no bundle files exist and no nested external references, though no content is offloaded to separate files.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and uses natural pricing vocabulary, but it omits an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause, which limits its completeness score. It defines a clear niche with low conflict risk relative to the related skills it lists.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming concrete trigger scenarios, e.g. 'Use when designing pricing tiers, choosing a value metric, or planning a price increase.'

Include common synonyms users might say ('subscription plans', 'tier design', 'monetization model') to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Mention the buyer segment dimension (SMB/mid-market/enterprise) to sharpen distinctiveness from generic product-strategy skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Quotes 'Design pricing, packaging, and monetization strategies based on value, customer willingness to pay, and growth objectives' — several concrete actions (design pricing, packaging, monetization) with only minor coverage gaps, fitting the 'lists several specific actions' anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

A clear 'what' is stated (design pricing/packaging/monetization strategies) but there is no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user-facing terms like 'pricing', 'packaging', 'monetization', and 'willingness to pay' are present and would be said naturally, though a few synonyms ('subscription tiers', 'plans') are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The pricing/packaging/monetization niche is mostly distinct from sibling skills (page-cro, copywriting) with only minor overlap risk, fitting the 'mostly distinct' anchor.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.