CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

python-development-python-scaffold

You are a Python project architecture expert specializing in scaffolding production-ready Python applications. Generate complete project structures with modern tooling (uv, FastAPI, Django), type hint

50

Quality

63%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/python-development-python-scaffold/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is python-development-python-scaffold in rmyndharis/antigravity-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is rich in copy-paste-ready scaffolding material and is organized into a clear sequence, but it front-loads boilerplate, embeds time-sensitive version pins, lacks any validation/verification step, and keeps all four framework templates inline in one long file. Splitting per-framework templates into references and adding a verify step would lift the weakest dimensions.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation checkpoint after scaffolding, e.g. 'Run `uv sync && uv run pytest` and confirm the health endpoint responds before presenting the project to the user' — workflow_clarity is capped at 3 without it.

Move each framework template (FastAPI, Django, Library, CLI) into its own reference file (e.g. references/fastapi.md) and keep SKILL.md as a decision overview, which would also cut the inline token load.

Remove the boilerplate padding — the verbatim description repeat, the tautological 'Do not use when' bullets, the vague Context section, and the version pins (or move pins into a dedicated, clearly-dated section) — and provide the missing config.py and router.py contents so the FastAPI example is fully executable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Most of the body is concrete and useful, but there is padded boilerplate (the opening paragraph repeats the description verbatim, the 'Do not use this skill when' section is tautological, the 'Context' section is vague, and the closing line repeats the intro) and time-sensitive version pins ('fastapi>=0.110.0', 'ruff>=0.2.0', 'django>=5.0.0') are scattered throughout without a deprecation/old-patterns section. Not a 2 because the bulk of the content is genuinely actionable rather than explanation of concepts Claude already knows.

3 / 5

Actionability

Highly concrete throughout: executable bash commands ('uv init <project-name>', 'uv venv'), complete pyproject.toml blocks, a Makefile, .env.example, and code samples for main.py and cli.py. Not a 5 because the FastAPI main.py imports 'from .config import settings' and '.api.v1.router' whose files are shown in the tree but never given content, so the primary path is not fully executable as written.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The numbered sequence (analyze project type -> init with uv -> generate the matching structure -> configure dev tools) is clear, but there are no validation checkpoints anywhere — no step verifies the environment, runs 'uv run pytest', or confirms the app starts. This matches anchor 3 ('steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints missing') rather than 4 ('most checkpoints present').

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized with numbered instruction subsections, but the ~325-line body inlines four full framework structures (FastAPI, Django, Library, CLI) that clearly belong in separate per-framework reference files, and no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist. This fits anchor 3 ('content that should be separate is inline') rather than 2, since structure and navigation within the file are good.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description communicates a clear, specific niche but is undermined by a mid-sentence truncation, second-person voice, and the complete absence of any 'Use when' trigger guidance. Fixing those three issues would move it into the top anchor range.

Suggestions

Complete the truncated sentence — the description currently ends mid-phrase at 'type hint', losing whatever capabilities and triggers were meant to follow.

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks to scaffold, set up, or create a new Python project, FastAPI/Django app, library, or CLI tool, or mentions uv, pyproject.toml, or project boilerplate.'

Rewrite in third person ('Scaffolds production-ready Python projects...') instead of the second-person 'You are a Python project architecture expert'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Concrete actions are present ('scaffolding production-ready Python applications', 'Generate complete project structures with modern tooling (uv, FastAPI, Django)'), which alone would fit the level-4 anchor, but the description uses second-person voice ('You are a Python project architecture expert') and is truncated mid-phrase ('type hint'), so the -1 person penalty applies.

3 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is mostly clear (scaffold production-ready Python apps with modern tooling) but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3; the mid-sentence truncation ('type hint') further weakens the 'what'. It is not a 2 because the stated capabilities are concrete and domain-specific rather than vague.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes relevant keywords users would naturally say ('Python', 'scaffolding', 'FastAPI', 'Django', 'uv') but misses common variations and synonyms like 'set up a project', 'boilerplate', 'template', or 'new project', and the truncation cuts off any further trigger phrases.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (Python project scaffolding) with named tools (uv, FastAPI, Django) makes it mostly distinct, with only minor overlap risk against general FastAPI/Django development or Python packaging skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

Path

plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/python-development-python-scaffold/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.