Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a richly actionable reference with concrete formulas, templates, and checklists, but it is verbose and monolithic — explaining concepts Claude already knows and inlining content that would benefit from separate reference files. Workflow sequencing is clear though it lacks explicit validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Move the tool/platform lists, email templates, and example case studies into reference files (e.g., references/templates.md, references/tools.md) and link to them from the body to improve progressive disclosure and conciseness.
Trim explanation of widely-known concepts (what a viral coefficient is, referral-vs-affiliate definitions, the Dropbox/Uber stories) to the essentials Claude can act on.
Add explicit validation/review checkpoints to the design and launch workflows (e.g., 'Verify tracking/attribution fires before launch', 'Validate fraud rules against test referrals').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with substantial actionable content (formulas, benchmark numbers, templates, tables), but padded with concepts Claude already knows — Dropbox/Uber/Notion example stories, referral-vs-affiliate definitions, K-factor explanation, and time-sensitive tool name lists — that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, usable guidance: the Max Referral Reward formula with a worked example, ROI formula, commission ranges, cookie-duration table, outreach and email templates, and checklists; minor gaps keep it just below copy-paste-ready code-level concreteness. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Design is sequenced as explicit Step 1/2/3 (trigger, share mechanism, incentive) and the launch checklist breaks into Before/Launch/Post-Launch with clear items; no destructive/batch validation cap applies, though explicit feedback/validation checkpoints are largely implicit rather than spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers, but it is a ~600-line monolith with no bundle files and no external references; reference-style content (tool lists, email templates, example case studies, affiliate details) that belongs in separate files is inlined. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |