CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

seo-authority-builder

Analyzes content for E-E-A-T signals and suggests improvements to build authority and trust. Identifies missing credibility elements. Use PROACTIVELY for YMYL topics.

55

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/seo-authority-builder/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is seo-authority-builder in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a reasonably organized instruction-only overview of an E-E-A-T audit, but it relies on abstract guidance, restates its own framework, and points to a missing resource file. Tightening the duplicated sections and adding concrete assessment heuristics would lift it materially.

Suggestions

Create the referenced resources/implementation-playbook.md (or fix the path) so the 'If detailed examples are required' pointer resolves to a real file.

Replace the duplicated signal/tactic lists (Framework vs Authority Building Tactics vs Trust Optimization) with a single canonical list and link out deeper tactics to a reference file.

Add concrete, executable assessment steps — e.g. a scoring rubric for each E-E-A-T dimension, a checklist of fields to inspect on a page, or a schema.org markup snippet — instead of abstract directives like 'Analyze content for existing E-E-A-T signals'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient bullet lists, but the Framework and the later 'Authority Building Tactics' / 'Trust Optimization' sections substantially restate the same signals, adding padding that could be trimmed.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides a concrete output template structure and a sequenced approach, but the guidance is largely abstract ('Analyze content', 'Recommend trust elements') with no concrete commands, assessment heuristics, or executable examples beyond the fill-in template.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A numbered seven-step 'Approach' sequence is present, but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops to confirm signal coverage or audit accuracy.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Has header-based structure and one signaled reference, but the referenced 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' does not exist in the bundle, and much of the inline list content (repeated tactic/signal enumerations) could be split out.

3 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states what the skill does and gives a usable (if narrow) trigger, with concrete domain actions. It is held below top marks by its somewhat abstract action wording and a 'when' clause scoped only to YMYL topics.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — 'Analyzes content for E-E-A-T signals', 'suggests improvements to build authority and trust', 'Identifies missing credibility elements' — covering the domain comprehensively, though slightly abstract compared to the score-5 anchor's enumeration of concrete deliverables.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Analyzes... suggests... Identifies...') and when ('Use PROACTIVELY for YMYL topics'), but the 'when' trigger is narrow (YMYL only) and could be more specific, fitting between the score-4 and score-5 anchors.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes domain-natural phrases a specialist would say — 'E-E-A-T signals', 'YMYL topics', 'authority and trust', 'Use PROACTIVELY' — but a few common synonyms a lay user might voice are missing, keeping it just below comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The E-E-A-T / YMYL / authority-building niche is mostly distinct from general SEO skills, with only minor overlap risk against closely related content-quality skills.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.