Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, concise, actionable workflow with explicit validation and clear sequencing across its six steps. All dimensions land at a strong 4, with only minor gaps preventing maximal scores.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and instruction-focused with no concept re-explanation, but has minor trim opportunities such as the repeated "Recommended sub-agent role" lines and "When to Use" content that overlaps the description, fitting anchor 4 rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete git diff commands, a specific finding shape, named modes, and concrete fix types; minor gap is the absence of literal copy-paste sub-agent prompt templates, fitting anchor 4 rather than fully copy-paste-ready anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps with an explicit validation step (Step 5) and a discard-weak-findings checkpoint; the destructive/batch cap does not apply because validation is present, but the validate->fix->retry loop is not spelled out as iterative and validation is mode-gated, fitting anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with clear section headers and well-organized content; no bundle files exist and nothing obviously needs splitting out, fitting anchor 4 rather than anchor 5 which requires clearly signaled one-level-deep references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |