CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

slack-automation

Automate Slack workspace operations including messaging, search, channel management, and reaction workflows through Composio's Slack toolkit.

64

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/slack-automation/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is slack-automation in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tightly-organized, highly actionable orchestration guide with concrete tool sequences, parameters, and pitfalls for each Slack workflow. Its main weaknesses are duplicated pitfall content, a generic closing 'When to Use' line, and the absence of explicit error-recovery feedback loops.

Suggestions

Remove the duplicated 'Known Pitfalls' section or fold it into the per-workflow Pitfalls blocks to tighten conciseness.

Replace the generic 'When to Use' line with concrete trigger conditions for each workflow.

Add a brief validate->fix->retry note for failure-prone steps (e.g., channel resolution falling back from FIND_CHANNELS to LIST_ALL_CHANNELS) to push workflow clarity toward 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Content is dense and tool-focused with compact sequences, params, and pitfalls, matching 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation'; not a 5 because pitfalls are duplicated per-workflow and again under 'Known Pitfalls', and the generic 'When to Use' closing line is filler.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides exact tool slugs, named parameters, literal error strings, and response field paths (e.g. 'response.data.messages.matches', 'response_metadata.next_cursor'), plus a copy-ready Quick Reference table — fully actionable instruction guidance; absence of literal code is not penalized for an instruction-only skill.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Each workflow is numbered with [Prerequisite]/[Required]/[Optional]/[Fallback] markers and Setup includes a verification checkpoint ('Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE'), matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints'; not a 5 because explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loops are absent, though the operations are not destructive enough to trigger the 3-cap.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Single file but well-organized into Prerequisites, Setup, five Core Workflows, Common Patterns, Known Pitfalls, and Quick Reference with no nested references, matching 'good structure; minor organization gaps'; not a 5 because at ~180 lines the Quick Reference or detailed pitfall catalog could plausibly be split into a separate reference file.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys what the skill does and is well-scoped to Slack automation via Composio, but it lacks any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3. Trigger-term and specificity coverage are solid but could be slightly more exhaustive.

Suggestions

Append an explicit 'Use when...' clause (e.g., 'Use when the user asks to send, search, or react to Slack messages, or manage Slack channels') to raise completeness above 3.

Add natural synonyms such as 'DM', 'post', and 'emoji' to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Replace the broad 'channel management' phrase with concrete actions like 'list and retrieve channel info' for tighter specificity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the Slack domain and lists several concrete actions — 'messaging, search, channel management, and reaction workflows' — matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor; not a 5 because 'channel management' is somewhat broad and scheduling/user management are not surfaced.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear ('Automate Slack workspace operations including...') but there is no 'Use when...' or equivalent trigger clause, so per the rubric cap completeness stays at 3; not a 4 because 'when' is entirely missing rather than weakly implied.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms users would say ('Slack', 'messaging', 'search', 'channel', 'reaction') are present, matching 'good keyword coverage; a few natural terms missing'; not a 5 because synonyms like 'DM', 'post', and 'emoji' are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The phrase 'through Composio's Slack toolkit' carves a clear, narrowly-scoped niche with distinct Slack-specific triggers and minimal overlap risk, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.