Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable and well-sequenced with a concrete code example and a validation checkpoint, but it is moderately verbose with overlapping sections and keeps a large prompt template inline rather than splitting it into a reference file.
Suggestions
Move the large Prompt Template and/or Edge Case Categories into a references/ file and link to it, reducing SKILL.md token load and improving progressive disclosure.
Trim redundancy between the Instructions, Quality Checklist, and Anti-Patterns sections so each token earns its place.
Add a concrete example for at least one more framework (e.g. pytest parametrize) and an explicit validate-fix-retry loop in the Validation section to reach 5 on actionability and workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows (no "what is TDD" padding), but the large inline Prompt Template plus the Quality Checklist, Anti-Patterns, and Edge Case Categories overlap and could be tightened. Not a 4 because several sections carry redundancy; not a 2 because it is not heavily padded with unnecessary concept explanations. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready TypeScript/Jest example and concrete per-framework patterns (vi.fn(), t.Parallel(), testify/assert, RSpec let), plus a parameterized prompt template. Not a 5 because only one full executable example is given and some categories (Property/Contract tests) lack concrete code; not a 3 because the guidance is genuinely executable rather than pseudocode. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Numbered Instructions plus a Validation section with an explicit checkpoint ("Run tests - confirm they fail") give a clear sequence with most checkpoints present. Not a 5 because the error-recovery feedback loop is implicit rather than a validate-fix-retry cycle; not a 3 because checkpoints are present and the operation is non-destructive so the 3-cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is well-sectioned but is a single 160-line file with the large Prompt Template and Edge Case Categories inlined, and no references/scripts/assets bundle exists to offload detail. Not a 4 because content that could live in a separate reference (the prompt template) is inline with no external navigation; not a 2 because section headers provide genuine structure rather than minimal organization. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |