Content
46%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is information-rich and actionable with concrete benchmarks and formulas, but it is overlong and inlines material that belongs in (missing) reference files, with broken cross-references and no validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Move the full salary/equity benchmark tables and ASCII org charts into the referenced separate files (references/compensation-benchmarks.md, references/equity-calculator.md, examples/org-chart-evolution.md) and keep only an overview plus pointers in SKILL.md.
Create the referenced files (resources/implementation-playbook.md, references/*, examples/*) or remove the dangling references so navigation is not broken.
Add explicit validation/verification steps to the Quick Start workflow (e.g., confirm budget sums, check equity pool does not exceed reserved percentage).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~410-line body inlines extensive benchmark tables (salary ranges, equity percentages, org charts) that the skill itself flags as belonging in separate reference files, padding the context with material that should be offloaded. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete numbers, executable formulas (Total Comp = Base x 1.30 + Equity), a worked budget example with arithmetic, and an 8-step Quick Start, with only minor gaps in procedural tooling. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Quick Start offers a clear 8-step sequence, but there are no validation or verification checkpoints and no error-recovery feedback loops for the planning workflow. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body references five external files (resources/implementation-playbook.md, two references/ files, two examples/ files), none of which exist, and inlines bulk reference data that should be split out, leaving references broken and structure poor. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |